IBM Rational ClearQuest vs IBM Rational RequisitePro [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Rational ClearQuest and IBM Rational RequisitePro [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, BMC, Microsoft and others in Software Configuration Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Software Configuration Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
Views
607
Comparisons
449
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In Software Configuration Management
Buyer's Guide
Software Configuration Management
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, BMC, Microsoft and others in Software Configuration Management. Updated: March 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Rational ClearQuest
Rational RequisitePro
Learn More
IBM
Video Not Available
Overview

IBM Rational ClearQuest is a fully customizable database workflow application development and production system. It provides flexible change and defect tracking, customizable processes, near real-time reporting and lifecycle traceability for better visibility and control of the software development lifecycle. IBM Rational ClearQuest provides scalable, multiplatform support to any size organization so you can continue to customize processes as your development needs evolve.

IBM Rational RequisitePro, a requirements management tool that teams can use to manage project requirements comprehensively in order to promote communication and collaboration among team members and reduce project risk. Requirements management is essential for improving your software development process. Rational RequisitePro uses a project database for managing requirements in views with sort and query capabilities. It also includes integration with Microsoft Word for creating and maintaining requirements documents that are linked to the database for real-time updates to requirements from within documents. The database and Word integration helps you organize and prioritize your requirements, trace relationships between them, and track changes that affect them. Traceability features visually indicate how changes affect the project, thereby helping to perform impact analysis and make informed decisions for scope management or resource allocation. Rational RequisitePro captures the change history for each requirement, thereby providing a paper audit of the evolution of project requirements.
Sample Customers
Atos SE, STM, Regence BlueCross BlueShield
Balfour Beatty, Amsterdam Airport Schiphol
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Manufacturing Company23%
Computer Software Company10%
Government9%
Energy/Utilities Company7%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business21%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise69%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Software Configuration Management
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, BMC, Microsoft and others in Software Configuration Management. Updated: March 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM Rational ClearQuest is ranked 6th in Software Configuration Management while IBM Rational RequisitePro [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Software Configuration Management. IBM Rational ClearQuest is rated 7.2, while IBM Rational RequisitePro [EOL] is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM Rational ClearQuest writes "Tracks change requests, problems, and physical asset management. I would like to see data type for floating point numbers. ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Rational RequisitePro [EOL] writes "Provides traceability for internal applications". IBM Rational ClearQuest is most compared with Jira, IBM Rational ClearCase, HCL Compass and IBM Rational Synergy, whereas IBM Rational RequisitePro [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Software Configuration Management vendors.

We monitor all Software Configuration Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.