Compare IBM Rational Functional Tester vs. TestingWhiz

IBM Rational Functional Tester is ranked 25th in Functional Testing Tools while TestingWhiz which is ranked 31st in Functional Testing Tools. IBM Rational Functional Tester is rated 0, while TestingWhiz is rated 0. On the other hand, IBM Rational Functional Tester is most compared with Selenium HQ, UFT (QTP) and Katalon Studio, whereas TestingWhiz is most compared with SmartBear TestComplete, Selenium HQ and Ranorex Studio.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
25th
Views
5,642
Comparisons
2,066
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
31st
Views
673
Comparisons
532
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Tricentis, Worksoft and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: August 2019.
361,263 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Top Comparisons
Compared 32% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Also Known As
Rational Functional Tester
Learn
IBM
Cygnet Infotech
Overview
IBM Rational Functional Tester is an automated functional testing and regression testing tool. This software provides automated testing capabilities for functional, regression, GUI, and data-driven testing. Rational Function Tester supports a range of applications, such as web-based, .Net, Java, Siebel, SAP, terminal emulator-based applications, PowerBuilder, Ajax, Adobe Flex, Dojo Toolkit, GEF, Adobe PDF documents, zSeries, iSeries, and pSeries.

TestingWhiz is a Codeless Automation Testing Tool for Software, Web, Mobile, Database, Cloud, Web Services and API testing. It is pillared on a strong architecture combined with intuitive Automation Engine and short learning curve that promises to take your test automation to the next level.

Offer
Learn more about IBM Rational Functional Tester
Learn more about TestingWhiz
Sample Customers
EdumateVerizon, IBM, Symantec, VMware, Hyundai, Choice Hotels, Intel, Autodesk, Frost
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Tricentis, Worksoft and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: August 2019.
361,263 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email