Rekha ChotaraIT Analyst at Tata Consultancy Services
AishwaryaAssociate Professional Product Developer at Computer Sciences Corporation
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"It has very easy and good validation techniques used for SWIFT, XSD, and WSDL validations."
"As we have used most of the MQ stub, "MQ recording" is the most useful feature."
"Ties-in with the rest of the SoapUI platform and its ability to record traffic and create a virtual endpoint."
"In times of DevOps, where continuous delivery and deployment is progressing at such a fast pace, ServiceV Pro has emerged as an add-on for enhancing our API product finish."
"Reporting: In the recent release of RCPT, the "Usage graph" feature is included, but that still needs improvements in terms of UI and timeline filtering criteria."
"Greater capacity to create Virtual APIs based on HAR files or wireshark recordings."
"The effort required to utilize the capabilities/usage of ServiceV Pro looks like the one area where we could have some further improvements"
"IBM RTVS is not that expensive compare to other giants, but it is still much ahead of some other tool having less features."
"The product has a free trial available, which has saves on the initial investment costs."
"Ability to have general IT staff enable developers using this software as opposed to more expensive vendors or developers building their own solution."
"Be updated with the latest offerings that the tool provides so as to avoid any clashes with issues, like licensing."
Testing environments are often expensive and can have limited availability. IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server helps you shift testing to the left by removing dependencies on components that are unavailable or already in use. These components are simulated at the API layer, supporting a wide variety of technologies, allowing your team to test the riskiest elements earlier in the delivery lifecycle.
API virtualization in ServiceV Pro helps you deliver great APIs on time and under budget, and does so for a fraction of the cost typically associated with traditional enterprise service virtualization suites.
IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server is ranked 4th in Service Virtualization with 2 reviews while SmartBear ServiceV Pro is ranked 3rd in Service Virtualization with 2 reviews. IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server is rated 7.6, while SmartBear ServiceV Pro is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server writes "It helped us to build IBM MQ based stubs and automated test cases. I would like it to be more user friendly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SmartBear ServiceV Pro writes "It has the capability to extend its features for the execution of our APIs ". IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server is most compared with Broadcom Service Virtualization and Parasoft Service Virtualization, whereas SmartBear ServiceV Pro is most compared with Broadcom Service Virtualization, Parasoft Service Virtualization and Micro Focus Service Virtualization. See our IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server vs. SmartBear ServiceV Pro report.
See our list of best Service Virtualization vendors.
We monitor all Service Virtualization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.