We performed a comparison between IBM Security QRadar and Rapid7 InsightOps based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Integration is very easy and the reporting is good."
"Technical support is good overall."
"The threat protection network is the most valuable feature, because when you get an offense, you can actually trace it back to where it originated from, how it originated, and why."
"The monitoring and dashboards are great."
"The simplicity of the solution is the best feature."
"The event collector, flow collector, PCAP and SOAR are valuable."
"This solution has excellent security analytics."
"I think this is a good product for enterprises because of the performance and out-of-the-box rules and use cases. If they want to reach the maturity level early, they can use these out-of-the-box rules and use cases. That will help them a lot."
"It has the ability to alert and track logs from different sources."
"The ability to browse logs from multiple sources at the same time really speeds up root cause analysis."
"Integration of InsightOps with other tools, especially SIEM solutions, has generally improved operational efficiency."
"The most valuable feature of Rapid7 InsightOps is the search functionality."
"We can save logs as plain text."
"IMB should reduce the pricing, or reduce some of the features for a more economical solution for the customer."
"Its architecture is very complicated."
"We sometimes get an error about the hard drive. Approximately once in two months, we can't find the logs, and they go missing, which is a terrible issue. We are getting support for this issue from our support company."
"The tech support is not that good."
"The pricing of the solution is a bit high. If they could lower it, that would be ideal."
"The playbook guide which specifies the rules for security use cases needs to be provided to support in case the organization needs help."
"I have noticed the interface has room for improvement."
"QRadar needs a lot of fine tuning"
"Since I used the beta, improvements are to be expected. The dashboard options could have been clearer, but I believe it is more a problem with the limited documentation available at the time."
"Rapid7 InsightOps could improve by making the search query better. There are times when the search query is broken and it does not find anything."
"There are a few things I would like to do with a few more complex queries which I am not able to do right now, because it is a SaaS solution."
"The solution takes a little bit of time when we load the website for the first time."
"Improvement is needed in the dashboard of InsightOps, especially for less technical users."
IBM Security QRadar is ranked 6th in Log Management with 198 reviews while Rapid7 InsightOps is ranked 35th in Log Management with 9 reviews. IBM Security QRadar is rated 8.0, while Rapid7 InsightOps is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of IBM Security QRadar writes "A highly stable and scalable solution that provides good technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Rapid7 InsightOps writes "Useful search functionality, easy to use, and reliable". IBM Security QRadar is most compared with Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk Enterprise Security, Wazuh, LogRhythm SIEM and Elastic Security, whereas Rapid7 InsightOps is most compared with Wazuh, Datadog, New Relic, Splunk Enterprise Security and LogRhythm SIEM. See our IBM Security QRadar vs. Rapid7 InsightOps report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.