IBM solidDB vs Netezza

IBM solidDB is ranked 15th in Relational Databases with 1 review vs Netezza which is ranked 5th in Data Warehouse with 6 reviews. The top reviewer of IBM solidDB writes "​No other solution came close to this product's speed and tech support is on a really high level". The top reviewer of Netezza writes "Reports used to take 30 to 60 minutes, now run consistently in seconds or minutes". IBM solidDB is most compared with MySQL, IBM DB2 and Oracle Database. Netezza is most compared with Vertica, Oracle Exadata and Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
Relational databases report from it central station 2018 01 27 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, Teradata, Microsoft and others in Relational Databases.
253,818 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing IBM solidDB vs Netezza

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Relational databases report from it central station 2018 01 27 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, Teradata, Microsoft and others in Relational Databases.
253,818 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
957
Comparisons
565
Reviews
1
Followers
235
Avg. Rating
9.0
Views
9,299
Comparisons
5,145
Reviews
7
Followers
816
Avg. Rating
8.3
Top Comparisons
Top Comparisons
Jt hjyjg 400x400
Compared 10% of the time.
Ibm
Compared 8% of the time.
Jt hjyjg 400x400
Compared 8% of the time.
See more IBM solidDB competitors »
Micro focus logo
Compared 16% of the time.
Jt hjyjg 400x400
Compared 15% of the time.
See more Netezza competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AssolidDB
Website/Video
Website/VideoIBM
  • Vendor 7400 screenshot 1514653938
IBM
  • Vendor 7400 screenshot 1514653938
OverviewQuestionmark icon
Overview

IBM solidDB is a relational database server that combines the high performance of in-memory tables with the nearly unlimited capacity of disk-based tables.

Pure in-memory databases are fast, but strictly limited by the size of memory. Pure disk-based databases allow nearly unlimited amounts of storage, but their performance is dominated by disk access. Even if the computer has enough memory to store the entire database in memory buffers, database servers that are designed for disk-based tables can be slow because the data structures that are optimal for disk-based tables are far from being optimal for in-memory tables. The solidDB solution is to provide a single hybrid database server that contains two optimized engines inside it:

  • The main-memory engine (MME) is optimized for in-memory access.
  • The disk-based engine (DBE) is optimized for disk-based access.

Both engines coexist inside the same server process, and a single SQL statement can access data from both engines.

IBM Netezza appliances are now part of IBM PureSystems - expert integrated systems with built in expertise, integration by design and a simplified user experience. Part of the PureData family, the Netezza appliance is now known as the PureData System for Analytics. It has the same key design tenets of simplicity, speed, scalability and analytics power that was fundamental to Netezza appliances.
Sample Customers
Sample CustomersIskratelSeattle Childrens Hospital, Carphone Warehouse, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Battelle, Start Today Co. Ltd., Kelley Blue Book, Trident Marketing, Elisa Corporation, Catalina Marketing, iBasis, Barnes & Noble, Qualcomm, MediaMath, Acxiom, iBasis, Foxwoods
Top IndustriesQuestionmark icon
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm
55%
Consumer Goods
9%
Retailer
9%
Pharma/Biotech Company
9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm
47%
Insurance Company
10%
Pharma/Biotech Company
6%
Retailer
5%
Company SizeQuestionmark icon
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business
13%
Midsize Enterprise
13%
Large Enterprise
75%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
10%
Midsize Enterprise
13%
Large Enterprise
77%
Relational databases report from it central station 2018 01 27 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, Teradata, Microsoft and others in Relational Databases.
Download now
253,818 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email