Compare IBM Netezza Performance Server vs. Oracle Database

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Snowflake Computing, Oracle, Micro Focus and others in Data Warehouse. Updated: November 2020.
447,846 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The performance is most important to me, and it helps our ability to make business decisions quickly."

More IBM Netezza Performance Server Pros »

"We use the relational databases for government contracts.""The features that we find most valuable are Data Pump, GoldenGate, and the RMAN (Recovery Manager).""It has automatic memory management capability and large file capability.""The feature I find most valuable about this solution is the reliability.""This solution has the best performance, bar none.""Oracle enables us to handle more than a million daily transactions.""Oracle Database is fast and easy to use.""The most valuable features of this solution are the cost optimizer and partition exchanges."

More Oracle Database Pros »

Cons
"The scalability is not as expected. The capacity in the black box is not enough."

More IBM Netezza Performance Server Cons »

"It is expensive.""This product would be improved with Support Services for more production access.""The Oracle Database could improve on integration with other infrastructure systems like Active Directory.""The product is very expensive.""The documentation needs improvement because as it is now, providing support is a headache.""The price tag is very high and most cannot afford it.""Cheap and easy solutions for startups need to be made available.""The cost of this solution needs to be improved."

More Oracle Database Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"It is an excellent product, as long as the organization can afford the price tag.""Our licensing costs are between $40,000 and $50,000 per year. Those are the costs that cover maintenance and licensing.""The pricing is something that Oracle should work on to make the product more affordable, especially to businesses in third-world countries.""It is very expensive. We pay in dollars, so the inflation and conversion cost is also there for us. They charge on a yearly basis for the license.""Its price is already low. Oracle has a competitive and cheaper price as compared to others. Oracle Cloud is cheaper than other clouds. The pricing is very competitive for Oracle Cloud to be in the market. Their pricing makes customers interested in using this product even though Oracle doesn't have a local data center at this moment.""They are pricing themselves out of the market.""It is expensive."

More Oracle Database Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Warehouse solutions are best for your needs.
447,846 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: We use IBM IPS and have migrated from Netezza. I am not benchmarking cloud based data warehouses which provide a more open and rapid expandable architecture, my focus is more on organization that has… more »
Top Answer: Yes, you can. The tech product will stay the same, what you need is to become an ISV (Independent Software vendor) Partner in the Oracle Partner Program, and negotiate an ESL (Embedded Software… more »
Top Answer: Per all previous posts "it depends". Platform, type of use and ability to be stable for the work-load are the concerns. Finding Oracle skills vs DB2 skills in the mainframe world is an area where… more »
Top Answer: If what you mean by "cloud-native" is "managed" or "as a service", then Oracle database with replication, the turnkey solution right now is Amazon RDS using Oracle. However, replication is not using… more »
Ranking
10th
out of 30 in Data Warehouse
Views
9,235
Comparisons
6,589
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
374
Avg. Rating
8.0
2nd
Views
18,363
Comparisons
13,324
Reviews
19
Average Words per Review
475
Avg. Rating
8.1
Popular Comparisons
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Also Known As
Netezza Performance Server, NetezzaOracle 12c, RDBMS
Learn
IBM
Oracle
Overview
IBM Netezza appliances are now part of IBM PureSystems - expert integrated systems with built in expertise, integration by design and a simplified user experience. Part of the PureData family, the Netezza appliance is now known as the PureData System for Analytics. It has the same key design tenets of simplicity, speed, scalability and analytics power that was fundamental to Netezza appliances.

Oracle Database 12c introduces a new multitenant architecture that makes it easy to consolidate many databases quickly and manage them as a cloud service. Oracle Database 12c also includes in-memory data processing capabilities for breakthrough analytical performance. Additional database innovations deliver new levels of efficiency, performance, security, and availability. Oracle Database 12c comes in two editions to fit your business needs and budget: Enterprise Edition and Standard Edition 2.

For more information on Oracle RDBMS, visit Oracle.com

Offer
Learn more about IBM Netezza Performance Server
Learn more about Oracle Database
Sample Customers
Seattle Childrens Hospital, Carphone Warehouse, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Battelle, Start Today Co. Ltd., Kelley Blue Book, Trident Marketing, Elisa Corporation, Catalina Marketing, iBasis, Barnes & Noble, Qualcomm, MediaMath, Acxiom, iBasis, FoxwoodsAgncia Nacional de guas, Anbima, Aria Systems, Asiana Airlines, Astelit LLC, Australian Finance Group, Banco Occidental de Descuento, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, BT, Caja de Seguros S.A., Casas GEO S.A.B. de C.V., Comic Relief UK, Corsair Components Inc., CSAM Health AS, CSOB Group, Datacraft Solutions, DenizBank A.S., Department of Treasury and Finance WA, Office of State Revenue, Deutsche B_rse AG, Deutsche Lufthansa AG, Deutsche Messe AG, Digicel Haiti, DPR COSEA, Essar Group, Essatto Software Pty Ltd, Farmšcia e Drogaria Nissei Ltda., Fomento Econ‹mico Mexicano S.A.B. de C.V. (FEMSA), FundaÊo Petrobras de Seguridade Social, Future Group, GFKL Financial Services AG, Grupo Posadas S.A.B. de C.V., Grupo Sinosserra, Guerra S.A. Implementos Rodovišrios, Hanatour International Service, Hays plc, Henan Mobile Co. Ltd, Hochschule Hof, Hong Kong and China Technology (Wuhan) Co. Ltd (Towngas Technology), Industries Corpa_al C.A., Infrastructure Development Finance Company Limited, Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatstica, Instituto Mexicano de la Propiedad Industrial, Kcell, LinkShare Corporation, MercadoLibre Inc., MetLife Inc., Nextgen Distribution, €BB-IKT GmbH, Octagon Research Solutions, Pacific Lutheran University, Paragon Data GmbH, Ping ltd., PJSC Trustbank, Prodaub _ Processamento de Dados de Uberl_ndia, Purdue University, Redknee Inc., Robi Axiata Limited, Shanghai Infoservice Technology Co. Ltd, Shanghai Sihua Technologies Co. Ltd, Sistema de Aguas de la Ciudad de M_xico, Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council, Suddenlink Communications, Suprajit Engineering Limited, Tallink Grupp, Terminales Ro de la Plata S.A., Therap Services LLC, Think Passenger Inc., Trafigura, Transmed S.A.L Lebanon, ValeShop, VelQuest Corporation, Vodafone Group plc, West Virginia Network, WIND Hellas Telecommunications S.A
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm38%
Comms Service Provider13%
Insurance Company13%
Retailer13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company42%
Comms Service Provider12%
Insurance Company8%
Media Company7%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm16%
Computer Software Company11%
Government9%
Comms Service Provider8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company39%
Comms Service Provider18%
K 12 Educational Company Or School6%
Government6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business16%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise75%
REVIEWERS
Small Business16%
Midsize Enterprise25%
Large Enterprise59%
Find out what your peers are saying about Snowflake Computing, Oracle, Micro Focus and others in Data Warehouse. Updated: November 2020.
447,846 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM Netezza Performance Server is ranked 10th in Data Warehouse with 3 reviews while Oracle Database is ranked 2nd in Relational Databases with 24 reviews. IBM Netezza Performance Server is rated 8.0, while Oracle Database is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of IBM Netezza Performance Server writes "We are now able to analyze products, stores, suppliers and sales as quickly as we need". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Database writes "Very robust, ideal for companies that need mission-critical databases, and extremely mature". IBM Netezza Performance Server is most compared with Oracle Exadata, SQL Server, Snowflake, IBM Db2 Database and Teradata, whereas Oracle Database is most compared with SQL Server, IBM Db2 Database, SAP HANA, MySQL and MariaDB.

See our list of .

We monitor all Data Warehouse reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.