IBM Spectrum Virtualize vs VMware Software Defined Storage comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Spectrum Virtualize and VMware Software Defined Storage based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about StarWind, Nutanix, Red Hat and others in Software Defined Storage (SDS).
To learn more, read our detailed Software Defined Storage (SDS) Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"When we add storage behind it, the product is good for the customers because their customers do not notice that anything is happening due to the virtualization.""It has the ability to seamlessly move hardware in and out as we refresh technology.""One of the main features of Spectrum Virtualize is it virtualizes the servers from the storage. We have a very large infrastructure. A major advantage is when you get the aged storage arrays and you have to replace all of those.""The SVC gives excellent performance with tiered storage behind it.""It lowers cost. It does so by getting more efficient use out of the technology behind it.""There are many benefits to this solution. Storage virtualization and the ability to migrate massive amounts of data to other systems without impacting your client are the most valuable. It is non-disruptive for my users. We migrated 350 terabytes of data in one night to a new machine without a small system going down and a single user complaining about the performance. You have to fine-tune a lot of storage machines constantly for performance and for making sure that they are optimal, but IBM Spectrum Virtualize does this by itself. It does the adjustment on its own, and it does it right. That's what makes it different. I had a huge VSP from Hitachi, which is also a type of virtualization-based engine but with a decent size. It was a continuous performance-tuning exercise. I never had that issue with IBM Spectrum Virtualize.""Using SBC, a valuable feature is the mirroring, which is the virtualization of the disk between disparate places.""The scalability is very good. It can handle anywhere from very small to large enterprise class."

More IBM Spectrum Virtualize Pros →

"The single management panel is the main feature that is wonderful for the customer.""This is an easy-to-use product for adding flexibility to your storage solution.""The best part of the solution is that you can actually scale up to a large number of operating systems without additional hardware.""VMware Software Defined Storage gives higher availability against data corruption."

More VMware Software Defined Storage Pros →

Cons
"They are actually working on one bug we found, which was with flash restore. This was the user interface design for virtual environments.""The integration would be an option that we would like, but I understand that's not how it's going to be implemented.""The Storwize port is not so stable.""The solution could have a better built-in performance monitor.""t is limited in terms of a single system to eight nodes or four, what they call IO groups.""For improvement considerations, I would probably say multiple sites.""Level 1 technical support needs improvement.""I would like to see more baseline replication and integration with the operating system between Vmware and IBMI."

More IBM Spectrum Virtualize Cons →

"It doesn't have the ability to be deployed on any kind of hardware and network connectors.""The performance is not as good as some competing products and reporting can be improved.""I'd like to see improved hardware compatibility""VMware Software Defined Storage should include a shared database on a standard version."

More VMware Software Defined Storage Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Generally the bundled licensing is more cost effective and gives flexibility to the solution. Linking into the Spectrum Suite can also be advantageous, but depends on the scale of the enterprise."
  • "We have struggled with Pure Storage, but people are understanding that much of Pure has been consumer grade SSDs. Therefore, when the customer is really understands what they are getting, they realize that IBM presents the same sort of value as existing vendors."
  • "We would like the CPU cycle to save more on the licensing costs for us."
  • "Do a proof of concept, if you are not comfortable jumping in, but do it."
  • "It has a lot of advanced functions for a reasonable price."
  • "I am very happy with the pricing. There is no comparison when it comes to pricing. I have looked at all solutions from EMC, Veritas, Hitachi, Dell, etc. None of them compares to IBM when it comes to pricing. I get great pricing from them."
  • "The entry point of pricing for this product is the most amazing price ever in the industry."
  • "This solution came as an additional cost for the TSM package we chose."
  • More IBM Spectrum Virtualize Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The product is quite expensive and is among the most expensive for this type of solution."
  • "A single socket costs you around US $6,000 for three years. At a minimum, you have a three load cluster for a medium or enterprise-scale company. It can get quite expensive because you're likely to need four to six sockets on the other side. It comes to around $30,000."
  • "I believe there is a yearly licensing fee of around $2000 - $5000. I don't think there are additional costs above that but it depends on the type of infrastructure you're booting."
  • "VMware Software Defined Storage is a slightly expensive solution."
  • More VMware Software Defined Storage Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Defined Storage (SDS) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Compared to other storage vendors, the solution is quite convenient to use.
    Top Answer:The pricing is pretty good. I rate the solution’s pricing a five out of ten. We have to pay for additional licenses.
    Top Answer:The solution could have a better built-in performance monitor. I use a different product for performance monitoring.
    Top Answer:VMware Software Defined Storage gives higher availability against data corruption.
    Top Answer:VMware Software Defined Storage is a slightly expensive solution. We do a three-year license for the solution, then renew it after every three years. I rate VMware Software Defined Storage a seven out… more »
    Top Answer:VMware Software Defined Storage should include a shared database on a standard version. Right now, it's included in the enterprise version.
    Ranking
    Views
    582
    Comparisons
    406
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    353
    Rating
    9.0
    Views
    588
    Comparisons
    400
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    407
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    VMware SDS
    Learn More
    Overview

    IBM Spectrum Virtualize is a dependable solution that improves data value, security, and simplicity for new and existing storage infrastructure. Proven over 12 years in thousands of deployments, its innovative virtualization capabilities help organizations achieve better data economics by supporting new workloads that are critical to their success. IBM Spectrum Virtualize software helps make new and existing storage more effective and standardizes functions traditionally deployed separately in disk systems for greater flexibility and potentially lower costs.

    VMware software-defined storage is a simple, yet intelligent, storage data center architecture that aligns with business and application demands—eliminating static, purpose-built and inefficient hardware with dynamic, agile and automated solutions.

    Sample Customers
    Pelephone, Sprint IT Enterprise Services
    Helse Nord, Sky
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Healthcare Company19%
    University14%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Retailer10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company23%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Government11%
    Retailer6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Hospitality Company7%
    Government5%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise67%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise62%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise70%
    Buyer's Guide
    Software Defined Storage (SDS)
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about StarWind, Nutanix, Red Hat and others in Software Defined Storage (SDS). Updated: March 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM Spectrum Virtualize is ranked 15th in Software Defined Storage (SDS) with 36 reviews while VMware Software Defined Storage is ranked 14th in Software Defined Storage (SDS) with 4 reviews. IBM Spectrum Virtualize is rated 8.8, while VMware Software Defined Storage is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM Spectrum Virtualize writes "A highly scalable product that is relatively easy to use and set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Software Defined Storage writes "A stable solution that can be used for database applications and virtualization for multiple locations". IBM Spectrum Virtualize is most compared with Dell VPLEX, VMware vSAN, VxRail, IBM Spectrum Scale and DataCore SANsymphony, whereas VMware Software Defined Storage is most compared with Red Hat Ceph Storage and Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI).

    See our list of best Software Defined Storage (SDS) vendors.

    We monitor all Software Defined Storage (SDS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.