IBM StoredIQ vs OpenText EnCase eDiscovery comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
59 views|44 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
OpenText Logo
549 views|431 comparisons
75% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM StoredIQ and OpenText EnCase eDiscovery based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery.
To learn more, read our detailed eDiscovery Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"IBM StoredIQ Suite helps to address problems like data discovery, records management, compliance activities, storage optimization, and data migration initiatives."

More IBM StoredIQ Pros →

"The technical support is excellent.""Data Recovery: Its ability to repair damaged partitions and uncover hidden partitions from within the tool, and allow further analysis.""It speeds up the process, so I can meet my deadlines.""I like the processing feature on the product because it does everything at once, i.e, indexing, recovery, keyword searches, etc.""The most important feature we've found is the Enscripts. That is one powerful feature that I, personally, love to use.""It indexes much faster, and is more reflexive because of the Enscripts.""The solution is very stable."

More OpenText EnCase eDiscovery Pros →

Cons
"The product was born and designed to be used inside the IT department, but it would be improved by allowing end-users to search for info related to specific needs."

More IBM StoredIQ Cons →

"Ease of use and learning curve need improvement.""We have come across problems with the end-case. We could not find an email discovery type of module and there was not flexibility with the email.""There were minor UI bugs.""​Sometimes the application can take more time to complete the image processing or fail at the end of the process.​""The reporting is a bit unreliable. It needs to be better.""I would like to see a capability to ingest and absorb more data. That would be really good. It currently is lacking this function.""In the past, incident response time for tech support was slow."

More OpenText EnCase eDiscovery Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "​The product is affordable and user-friendly.​"
  • "EnCase is an affordable solution."
  • "We have a license. And, we found the cost high. We contacted them and talked to them about the ratio of the US dollar versus the Indian rupee and then we came to a solution."
  • "We have a license. And, we found the cost high. We contacted them and talked to them about the ratio of the US dollar versus the Indian rupee and then we came to a solution."
  • More OpenText EnCase eDiscovery Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which eDiscovery solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:I rate the product’s pricing a five out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.
    Top Answer:We have experience in engineering and capital projects. It is an add-on to extend project and asset management documentation.
    Ranking
    27th
    out of 40 in eDiscovery
    Views
    59
    Comparisons
    44
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    6th
    out of 40 in eDiscovery
    Views
    549
    Comparisons
    431
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    343
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    EnCase eDiscovery
    Learn More
    Overview

    IBM StoredIQ addresses the problems that challenge records management, electronic discovery, compliance, storage optimization and data migration initiatives. By providing an in-depth assessment of unstructured data where it resides, the software gives organizations visibility into data to make more informed business and legal decisions.

    eDiscovery collection tools address the rise in dispersed and remote workforces, the proliferation of mobile devices and new sources of data. Comprehensively collecting data across all data sources, including endpoints, such as desktops and laptops, is critical to defensibility. Collection analytics and culling is key to efficient digital investigations, narrowing the document collection to drive down the cost of legal review.

    With OpenText™ EnCase™ eDiscovery, organizations can streamline the collection, culling and preservation of data across diverse sources in a single efficient process.

    Sample Customers
    J.B. Hunt Transport, BBVA Compass
    Ontario Ministry of Government, Aerospace Company, Chesterfield Police Department
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Energy/Utilities Company7%
    Legal Firm7%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise29%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise75%
    Buyer's Guide
    eDiscovery
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery. Updated: April 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM StoredIQ is ranked 27th in eDiscovery while OpenText EnCase eDiscovery is ranked 6th in eDiscovery with 8 reviews. IBM StoredIQ is rated 8.0, while OpenText EnCase eDiscovery is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of IBM StoredIQ writes "Helps with GDPR compliance through data discovery and management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText EnCase eDiscovery writes "A stable and scalable hybrid solution with easy setup". IBM StoredIQ is most compared with , whereas OpenText EnCase eDiscovery is most compared with Nuix eDiscovery, CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) and Microsoft Purview eDiscovery.

    See our list of best eDiscovery vendors.

    We monitor all eDiscovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.