IBM Supply Chain Business Network vs SWIFTnet FIN comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
262 views|171 comparisons
SWIFT Logo
1,036 views|844 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Supply Chain Business Network and SWIFTnet FIN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, MuleSoft, IBM and others in Business-to-Business Middleware.
To learn more, read our detailed Business-to-Business Middleware Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use IBM Supply Chain Business Network?
OleksiiShcherbatiuk
Ranking
Views
262
Comparisons
171
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
1,036
Comparisons
844
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Business-to-Business Middleware
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, MuleSoft, IBM and others in Business-to-Business Middleware. Updated: April 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
IBM Sterling B2B Collaboration Network, Sterling Commerce Collaboration Network
Learn More
IBM
Video Not Available
Overview

IBM B2B Collaboration Network helps you reduce the time and complexity of integrating with your local and global business partners. Use our expert services to on-board faster, automate electronic document interchange and manage your B2B operations—through a connection to more than 300,000 trading partners worldwide. The secure and scalable solution can help you solve business-to-business challenges such as managed file transfer, language translations and connecting people, systems and technology.

FIN enables financial institutions to exchange individual structured (MT and ISO 15022 message formats) financial messages securely and reliably. FIN is used by over 10,800 financial institutions and their corporate customers worldwide to exchange over 22.3+ million messages per day across a wide range of business areas within the banking and securities industries.

FIN value-added processing includes:

  • Message validation to ensure messages are formatted according to SWIFT message standards.
  • Delivery monitoring and prioritization.
  • Message storage and retrieval.

It is based on a distributed processing architecture with full, built-in redundancy to ensure maximum availability.

Sample Customers
Bonnie Plants, Irish Dairy Board
Alcatel-Lucent, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Canadian National Railway, General Electric Company, Huawei, Novartis International, Standard Bank, UniCredit, Volvo
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm58%
Computer Software Company9%
Comms Service Provider4%
Retailer4%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business10%
Midsize Enterprise7%
Large Enterprise82%
Buyer's Guide
Business-to-Business Middleware
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, MuleSoft, IBM and others in Business-to-Business Middleware. Updated: April 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM Supply Chain Business Network is ranked 17th in Business-to-Business Middleware while SWIFTnet FIN is ranked 6th in Business-to-Business Middleware. IBM Supply Chain Business Network is rated 0.0, while SWIFTnet FIN is rated 9.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of SWIFTnet FIN writes "Has strong stability and professional support". IBM Supply Chain Business Network is most compared with IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services and OpenText Trading Grid, whereas SWIFTnet FIN is most compared with SWIFT InterAct.

See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors.

We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.