We performed a comparison between IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] and Keeper based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Auth0 and others in Single Sign-On (SSO)."Single Sign-On functionality is valuable because the core purpose of the product is to allow universal (or bespoke) SSO for application suites."
"The integration effort with the end application is quite straightforward and easy."
"The Verify feature: A push method which customers are going for."
"SAML 2.0."
"OAuth 2 is now the de facto standard for API protection and scoped authorized delegation. IBM TAM now supports OAuth 2 and can act as fully compliant OAuth 2 authorization server."
"I can access my passwords from any Internet connected device."
"A useful solution for storing encryption keys, programming and developing a SaaS platform."
"The installation and its use are very simple."
"Chrome extension and app."
"Keeper was user-friendly."
"It is nice to be able to use my Touch ID and have access to all my passwords in one place."
"Possibility to login using the fingerprint sensor on Android/iPhone."
"Auto login across platforms allows for no copying and pasting."
"Multi-factor authentication with social integration needs to improve."
"The self-service portal needs improvement."
"An Amazon Machine Image (AMI) for the newer appliance versions for hosting the virtual appliances on AWS will help."
"The profiling element is incredibly robust, but also equally as complex, it requires an off-site course to be able to understand the context or the plethora of options available."
"Looking at their roadmap, they have a broad grasp of the security features which the industry needs."
"If you purchase the premium, then after the subscription expires, you cannot edit your passwords any longer, even if you could before you purchased the paid subscription."
"I would add a category for personal documents or photos of ID cards."
"It would be nice to see this great tool integrate with other tools out there."
"The password rotation feature could be improved."
"API possible needs improvement. Although, this feature is for enterprises which need more then the usual usage."
"Rearranging folders via drag/drop functionality would be very helpful."
"The user experience and the mobile app could be improved."
"Needs to provide an API to be integrated with the information systems and offer secure file hosting service with sharing and editing capabilities."
More IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Single Sign-On (SSO) while Keeper is ranked 10th in Enterprise Password Managers with 32 reviews. IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] is rated 8.0, while Keeper is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] writes "Reverse proxy means applications need only minimal changes to support SSO with ISAM". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Keeper writes "It's an inexpensive, scalable solution that has improved our security". IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Keeper is most compared with HashiCorp Vault, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Azure Key Vault, LastPass and Delinea Secret Server.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
