We performed a comparison between CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Keeper based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, BeyondTrust and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM)."It is scalable."
"The product is an important security measure against credential theft. It ensures session isolation and password rotation including pushing passwords to the endpoints."
"It is a scalable product."
"I found it valuable that CyberArk Privileged Access Manager can be integrated with PTA (privileged threat analytics), and this means that it will tell you if there's a risk to the logins and signs of risk and if risky behavior is observed. It's a good feature. Another good feature is the CPM (central password manager) because it helps you rotate the passwords automatically without involving the admins. It can go and update the scheduled tasks and the services. At the same time, if there's an application where it cannot do all of these, CPM will trigger an automatic email to the application owners, telling them that they should go ahead and change the password. This allows you to manage the account password that CyberArk cannot manage, which helps mitigate the risk of old passwords, where the password gets compromised, and also allows you to manage the security of the domain."
"We are utilizing CyberArk to secure applications, credentials, and endpoints."
"Technical support has been very responsive in navigating challenges. It is very easy to open a ticket."
"It's secure and reliable. I especially appreciate that it's locked down and only allows access to authorized components."
"The most valuable feature is that it always provides flexibility, password quality and one-time user check-in and check-out."
"i have only one password to remember, which is the one to get me into Keeper."
"Keeper has strong security features."
"I like Keeper's mobility and its accessibility."
"The generator of complex passwords keeps me safe from being hacked."
"Possibility to login using the fingerprint sensor on Android/iPhone."
"It is very easy to use, intuitive, and cost effective."
"It is nice to be able to use my Touch ID and have access to all my passwords in one place."
"The possibility of assigning information to different groups and individuals has been the most valuable."
"The turnaround time for technical support is lengthy."
"It can be made user-friendly, in the sense of the console is pretty outdated."
"Its pricing is a big challenge here. When it started, the product came in at a very low cost. Now, they are the leaders in the market, so the cost has grown and is quite huge."
"They can do a better job in the PSM space."
"The lead product has a slow process. There are some reports and requirements from CyberArk which are not readily available as an applicable solution. We have made consistent management requests in the logs."
"The tool’s pricing and scalability can be better."
"The initial setup of CyberArk is a challenge if you do not have prior experience with it."
"Having a centralized place to manage the solution has been something that I have always wanted, and they are starting to understand that and bring things back together."
"Ability to store 'files' from IOS & Android devices. You can store pics from these devices currently. Most file formats can be uploaded from PC's/Macs"
"I would love it if you didn't have to re-authenticate when you start up a new browser."
"It would be nice to see this great tool integrate with other tools out there."
"Keeper does not provide password management for mobile apps."
"I would add a category for personal documents or photos of ID cards."
"Needs to improve KeeperFill on iOS."
"Maybe a sort of category organizer to help with organizing passwords for different things, such as banking, medical, shopping, and school."
"Possible offline access to passwords. Therefore, when internet access is unavailable, I can still access my vault."
More CyberArk Privileged Access Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is ranked 1st in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 142 reviews while Keeper is ranked 10th in Enterprise Password Managers with 32 reviews. CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is rated 8.8, while Keeper is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager writes "Lets you ensure relevant, compliant access in good time and with an audit trail, yet lacks clarity on MITRE ATT&CK". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Keeper writes "It's an inexpensive, scalable solution that has improved our security". CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Microsoft Entra ID, Delinea Secret Server, WALLIX Bastion and One Identity Safeguard, whereas Keeper is most compared with HashiCorp Vault, Azure Key Vault, LastPass, Delinea Secret Server and AWS Secrets Manager.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.