IBM Watson Content Hub vs Quintype comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
278 views|83 comparisons
Quintype Logo
265 views|213 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Watson Content Hub and Quintype based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Wordpress, Adobe and others in Web Content Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Web Content Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
23rd
Views
278
Comparisons
83
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
16th
Views
265
Comparisons
213
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Web Content Management
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Wordpress, Adobe and others in Web Content Management. Updated: March 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
IBM Web Content Manager, Watson Content Hub
Learn More
IBM
Video Not Available
Overview
The Watson Content Hub gives business owners the power to create iconic, robust and consistent brand experiences using cloud-based, cognitive content management capabilities. Marketing and merchandising professionals can quickly select content to create relevant offers delivered across multiple channels, such as mobile, web-based or email, including those delivered by IBM Campaign Automation and IBM Digital Commerce.

Bold is the CMS that understands your content. Unlike a traditional CMS, Bold separates the presentation of the content from the content itself. This makes it effortless to create, curate and distribute content for modern consumption across different screens and screen-less voice devices. With a content workflow that is modeled after an effective newsroom, Bold makes it easy for authors to tell stories better with built-in support for reusable content cards, story elements, and story types.

All content added on Bold is optimized for distribution across channels such as SEO, Social and Mobile. Third-party integrations include Apple News, Google News, Facebook Instant Articles, AMP, PWA, Push notifications, email marketing, RSS feeds and others.

As a hosted SaaS CMS, Bold manages server management, performance, security and upgrades for its clients so that digital publishers can focus on creating great content for their audience.

Bold offers developers well-documented APIs, starter kits and design consulting services to jumpstart their own front-end development.

Bold offers free onboarding, migration services, 24/7 chat/email support, auto-scaling infrastructure, 95.95% uptime guarantee and regular backups.

Pricing for bold begins at $99/mo.

Sample Customers
Factor-y S.r.l., Cochlear Limited, Amadori Group, Superior Group, Department of Justice
BloombergQuint, The Quint, National Herald, Samachara
Buyer's Guide
Web Content Management
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Wordpress, Adobe and others in Web Content Management. Updated: March 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM Watson Content Hub is ranked 23rd in Web Content Management while Quintype is ranked 16th in Web Content Management. IBM Watson Content Hub is rated 0.0, while Quintype is rated 0.0. On the other hand, IBM Watson Content Hub is most compared with , whereas Quintype is most compared with WordPress.

See our list of best Web Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Web Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.