We performed a comparison between IBM WebSphere BPMS and Oracle BPEL based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Appian and others in Process Automation."The UI capabilities of the solution are great. The speed of delivery is good."
"This product is flexible in its ability to integrate processes and it can be extended and integrated with other software."
"We like the feature in which we can trace back instances."
"The product has everything we need."
"What I find the most valuable about Oracle BPEL is that it saves me time."
"The solution lacks acceptable stability."
"The user interface could be improved, and although integration opportunities are good, they could be improved further."
"Sometimes there are tasks that failed without any reason."
"In the next release, I would like to see REST improved and new technologies for microservices. I'd like to see more containers for separating containers."
"Some user-defined functions for transformation must be added to the next release of the solution."
Earn 20 points
IBM WebSphere BPMS is ranked 33rd in Process Automation while Oracle BPEL is ranked 16th in Process Automation with 2 reviews. IBM WebSphere BPMS is rated 6.6, while Oracle BPEL is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of IBM WebSphere BPMS writes "Standardizes and automates business processes for efficiency ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle BPEL writes "A highly scalable solution that provides various features for the execution of business processes". IBM WebSphere BPMS is most compared with , whereas Oracle BPEL is most compared with Camunda, BizTalk Server and Bonita.
See our list of best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
