We performed a comparison between IdentityMind and Riskified based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention."They have a very wide variety of rules that allow you to integrate well."
"The automated checks are excellent."
"The scoring mechanism is good."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the scoring and the yes, or no function."
"Our clients have definitely avoided losing money on multiple occasions due to fraud."
"Some of the language around rules and integration can certainly be improved."
"The UI at first felt like it wasn't the easiest interface to interact with."
"The user interface could be more intuitive."
"I can't think of any issues that we've faced that need to be improved."
"The fraud channel is a sensitive spot, so it's always complex."
Earn 20 points
IdentityMind is ranked 52nd in Fraud Detection and Prevention while Riskified is ranked 6th in Fraud Detection and Prevention with 3 reviews. IdentityMind is rated 8.6, while Riskified is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of IdentityMind writes "Great third-party integrations, very stable and easy to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Riskified writes "Integrates well, reasonably priced, and the technical support is helpful". IdentityMind is most compared with , whereas Riskified is most compared with Forter, Kount, Amazon Fraud Detector, Accertify Interceptas and Signifyd.
See our list of best Fraud Detection and Prevention vendors.
We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.