We performed a comparison between Imperva DDoS and StackPath WAF based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."Scalability is pretty easy on the base platform. You just add another, and you're ready to go."
"The solution has a very good interface."
"Technical support provides good, quick responses."
"Real-time monitoring is also a great tool, as you may watch several parameters in real time."
"The complete solution is valuable for everything it delivers and the protection it offers."
"Its unique interface for managing security performance and ease of use are the most valuable features of this solution."
"Simplifies putting everything in code."
"On the activity log, I can see the exact details, the visit, and the threat."
"The product’s most valuable is WAF. The authentication feature helps us protect WordPress sites."
"Certificate management could be improved."
"There’s nothing that’s missing in terms of features."
"Users would benefit from better documentation. There is official documentation, but sometimes we need more detail. We have some use cases that are not so run of the mill. It would be great if there was a knowledge base that we could go to for more answers."
"The solution should integrate with something that looks at continuous security management."
"It would be better if we were able to manage and apply changes to multiple websites/web applications, and search WAF logs for multiple websites, via the Incapsula dashboard."
"The log analytics interface within Incapsula isn't really good. For example, if you have to get all logs from there, it's a very cumbersome process."
"I am not sure if this application has a policy where you can create your custom policy and run it as our firewall. We should have some ability to also create some custom policy, then run it as a firewall."
"Imperva always needs to adjust to new versions of cyber attacks, it needs to be faster, improve the resiliency of the software of the solution."
"The product’s performance for caching feature needs improvement."
Imperva DDoS is ranked 18th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 74 reviews while StackPath WAF is ranked 27th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 1 review. Imperva DDoS is rated 8.8, while StackPath WAF is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Imperva DDoS writes "I like the content monitoring feature which I haven't seen in other WAF solutions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of StackPath WAF writes "Stable product with an easy setup process ". Imperva DDoS is most compared with Cloudflare, Akamai, Arbor DDoS, Radware DefensePro and AWS WAF, whereas StackPath WAF is most compared with AWS WAF and Sucuri.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.