Impulse Point SafeConnect vs UserLock comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Impulse Point Logo
161 views|81 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
IS Decisions Logo
1,230 views|907 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Impulse Point SafeConnect and UserLock based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, HPE Aruba Networking, Forescout and others in Network Access Control (NAC).
To learn more, read our detailed Network Access Control (NAC) Report (Updated: April 2024).
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It is very easy to scale the product."

More Impulse Point SafeConnect Pros →

"We mainly implemented UserLock for multi-factor authentication, but the user login insights are also nice.""The most valuable features are two-factor authentication and real-time logon monitoring."

More UserLock Pros →

Cons
"The solution would be much better if it offered self-service onboarding."

More Impulse Point SafeConnect Cons →

"The product and service are already great as it is but if I could add one feature, I guess it would be nice to have another factor of authentication (two additional factors) like your phone and a token for example, for when people forget their phone at home.""I would like to see UserLock add the ability to automatically create a group policy in Active Directory. That might streamline the setup process."

More UserLock Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "For our tier group, for one year, the cost is probably around $10,000 for the license. If you do multi-year, you could get two years, and you could get it for about $8,000 per year. If you do three years, you get it around $7,000 a year."
  • More Impulse Point SafeConnect Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "You will be hard-pressed to find better pricing."
  • More UserLock Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Ranking
    Views
    161
    Comparisons
    81
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    21st
    Views
    1,230
    Comparisons
    907
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Network Access Control (NAC)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, HPE Aruba Networking, Forescout and others in Network Access Control (NAC). Updated: April 2024.
    770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    SafeConnect
    Learn More
    Impulse Point
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    SafeConnect provides the ability to automate the enforcement of security compliance and network access control policies (based on identity, device type, location, and ownership), and gathers a wealth of real-time and historical context-aware device data so you can make more informed and intelligent decisions.

    Two Factor Authentication & Access Management for Windows Active Directory.

    UserLock helps administrators to manage and secure access for every user, without obstructing employees or frustrating IT.

    Two Factor Authentication on Windows logon, RDP, IIS and VPN connections. UserLock supports 2FA using authenticator applications which include Google Authenticator, Microsoft Authenticator and LastPass Authenticator, or programmable hardware tokens such as YubiKey and Token2.

    Single Sign-On: Secure and frictionless access to Microsoft 365 and other Cloud Applications, using on-premise Active Directory credentials.

    Access Restrictions: Using the contextual information around a user’s logon, UserLock will authorize, deny or limit how a user can access the network, once authenticated.

    Access Monitoring: Track and alert on all users’ logon and logoff activity in real-time. Interact remotely with any session and respond to login behavior. 

    Access Auditing: Record and report on all user connection events to provide a central audit across the whole network.

    Sample Customers
    Aerohive Solution
    Barclays, US Department of Justice, National Bank of Kuwait, Turkish Aerospace, New York Albany School District, Regtransfers, University of Kent, Camden City School District, Oklahoma City Public Schools, Bank of Cyprus, Detran-PE: Pernambuco State Traffic Department
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government10%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Construction Company8%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business40%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise48%
    Buyer's Guide
    Network Access Control (NAC)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, HPE Aruba Networking, Forescout and others in Network Access Control (NAC). Updated: April 2024.
    770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Impulse Point SafeConnect is ranked 17th in Network Access Control (NAC) while UserLock is ranked 21st in Authentication Systems. Impulse Point SafeConnect is rated 8.0, while UserLock is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Impulse Point SafeConnect writes "Easy to scale, enforces policies well, and has responsive technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of UserLock writes "Affordable, easy to use, and integrates well with Active Directory". Impulse Point SafeConnect is most compared with Forescout Platform, whereas UserLock is most compared with Cisco Duo, Microsoft Entra ID, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, Silverfort and AlertEnterprise Enterprise Guardian.

    We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.