Compare Infocyte HUNT vs. Tanium

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cisco AMP for Endpoints Logo
19,535 views|13,653 comparisons
Infocyte HUNT Logo
158 views|101 comparisons
Tanium Logo
12,547 views|9,173 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, Carbon Black and others in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR). Updated: April 2021.
475,291 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"For the initial first level of support, we provide it from our side. If there's escalation required, we use Cisco tech for the AMP. And again, they are perfect. I mean, one of the best, compared to any other vendors.""The most valuable features of this solution are the IPS and the integration with ISE.""The simplicity of use is its most valuable feature. You can very clearly see things.""The stability of the solution is perfect. I believe it's the most stable solution on the market right now.""I am really satisfied with the technical support.""It is a very stable program.""The solution's integration capabilities are excellent. It's one of the best features.""It doesn't impact the devices. It is an agent-based solution, and we see no performance knock on cell phones. That was a big thing for us, especially in the mobile world. We don't see battery degradation like you do with other solutions which really drain the battery, as they're constantly doing things. That can shorten the useful life of a device."

More Cisco AMP for Endpoints Pros »

"The insight that the solution provides is the most valuable aspect. The security scanning they do is excellent."

More Infocyte HUNT Pros »

"I'm not so familiar with the tool but I like the interaction of the console to the picture. Patching is the primary model I have been focusing on for the last couple of weeks. So I have created a proof of concept environment and have been checking the available features.""The security features are very valuable.""For incident response tasks, all these tasks can get done in minutes with minimal disruption to the end-user."

More Tanium Pros »

Cons
"The solution needs more in-depth analytics.""In the next version of this solution, I would like to see the addition of local authentication.""The initial setup is a bit complex because you need to execute existing antiviruses or security software that you have on your device.""In the next release, I would for it to have back up abilities. I would like the ability to go back to a point in time to when my PC was uninfected and to the moment of when the infection happened.""The reporting and analytics areas of the solution need to be improved.""I would like more seamless integration.""The technical support is very slow.""I would recommend that the solution offer more availability in terms of the product portfolio and integration with third-party products."

More Cisco AMP for Endpoints Cons »

"The deployment of the solution right now is terrible. We find it to be very bad. It could be improved enormously."

More Infocyte HUNT Cons »

"Most of the time, agent-relative issues have to be more equipped with self-healing features. At times, the agent is there, but for some reason, it doesn't report a status. It gives certain problems that are obviously agent-based.""The solution lacks mobility.""The solution can give a lot of false positives."

More Tanium Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The costs of 50 licenses of AMP for three years is around $9,360.""The price is very good.""The visibility that we have into the endpoint and the forensics that we're able to collect give us value for the price. This is not an overly expensive solution, considering all the things that are provided. You get great performance and value for the cost.""Whenever you are doing the licensing process, I would highly advise to look at what other Cisco solutions you have in your organization, then evaluate if an Enterprise Agreement is the best way to go. In our case, it was the best way to go. Since we had so many other Cisco products, we were able to tie those in. We were actually able to get several Cisco security solutions for less than if we had bought three or four Cisco security solutions independently or ad hoc.""In our case, it is a straightforward annual payment through our Enterprise Agreement.""Our company was very happy with the price of Cisco AMP. It was about a third of what we were paying for System Center Endpoint Protection.""There are a couple of different consumption models: Pay up front, or if you have an enterprise agreement, you can do a monthly thing. Check your licensing possibilities and see what's best for your organization.""The Enterprise Agreement is like an all-you-can-eat buffet of Cisco products. In that vein, it was very affordable."

More Cisco AMP for Endpoints Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.
475,291 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Among the most valuable features are the exclusions. And on the scalability side, we can integrate well with the SIEM… more »
Top Answer: We use the MSP model, so we're able to pay as we go. We report usage based on the actual usage, which is very handy. The… more »
Top Answer: Like any other security tool, there's always rooms for improvement. Some of the ways the product can be improved are: -… more »
Top Answer: The insight that the solution provides is the most valuable aspect. The security scanning they do is excellent.
Top Answer: I didn't take part in the purchasing process and therefore can't speak to the costs surrounding licensing.
Top Answer: The deployment of the solution right now is terrible. We find it to be very bad. It could be improved enormously. The… more »
Top Answer: The security features are very valuable.
Top Answer: Our biggest issue with the solution is its lack of mobility. Also, when it comes to deploying the SaaS, it's more… more »
Top Answer: Our primary use case of this solution is for endpoint protection and, more particularly, the patching. We are… more »
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Cisco Secure Endpoint
Learn More
Overview

Advanced Malware Protection (AMP) is subscription-based, managed through a web-based management console, and deployed on a variety of platforms that protects endpoints, network, email and web Traffic. AMP key features include the following: Global threat intelligence to proactively defend against known and emerging threats, Advanced sandboxing that performs automated static and dynamic analysis of files against more than 700 behavioral indicators, Point-in-time malware detection and blocking in real time and Continuous analysis and retrospective security regardless of the file's disposition and Continuous analysis and retrospective security.

Infocyte HUNT is an “agentless” platform, designed to check the endpoints in your network for possible breaches, without requiring complex equipment and installations on the endpoints. The product complements the existing traditional defence mechanisms by combining forensic automation with patented algorithms.

Tanium Endpoint Platform reduces security risk, improves agility & increases efficiency, a fundamentally new approach to endpoint security's threat detection, indicent response, vulnerability assessment and configuration compliance & with management's software distribution, asset utilization, asset inventory and patch management.

Offer
Learn more about Cisco AMP for Endpoints
Learn more about Infocyte HUNT
Learn more about Tanium
Sample Customers
Heritage Bank, Mobile County Schools, NHL University, Thunder Bay Regional, Yokogawa Electric, Sam Houston State University, First Financial Bank
Check Point Software, PwC, Grant Thornton, AT&T, DHL, U.S. Department of Defense
JPMorgan Chase, eBay, Amazon, US Bank, MetLife, pwc, Cerner, Delphi, MGM Grand, New York Life
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Healthcare Company20%
Government13%
University7%
Comms Service Provider7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider27%
Computer Software Company22%
Government6%
Financial Services Firm5%
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider13%
Government9%
Financial Services Firm8%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business36%
Midsize Enterprise16%
Large Enterprise48%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business26%
Midsize Enterprise19%
Large Enterprise55%
No Data Available
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, Carbon Black and others in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR). Updated: April 2021.
475,291 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Infocyte HUNT is ranked 22nd in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 1 review while Tanium is ranked 10th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 3 reviews. Infocyte HUNT is rated 6.0, while Tanium is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Infocyte HUNT writes "Good security scanning, but has a complex setup and the stability isn't ideal". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tanium writes "Great inventory tool that that scans well for vulnerabilities and offers minimal end-user disruption". Infocyte HUNT is most compared with SentinelOne and CrowdStrike Falcon, whereas Tanium is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, Carbon Black CB Defense, BigFix, SCCM and Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.