We performed a comparison between Informatica Axon and MANTA Flow based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Collibra, Informatica and others in Data Governance."It is a very stable solution. I rate its stability a ten out of ten...It is a scalable solution...Informatica Axon's technical support is good."
"You can extract and transfer your data as you wish it to be consumed later."
"Axon does one interesting thing that I don't think other tools do as well. It lets you rate data and incorporates Informatica's data quality feature into it. There are little indications and graphics that show you how good the data quality is, and you can drill into it to see where potential issues lie."
"The dictionary, the search, and the ratings are without a doubt the most beneficial components of this solution."
"The product is stable."
"Able to customize data search and data sharing."
"The most valuable feature of Informatica Axon is features, interfaces, and data mapping. It represents clusters nicely."
"The solution offers good data governance."
"The solution is stable. We have not found any fatal errors yet."
"I believe it is very powerful. And for technicians, you can see the impact analysis, you can compare versions. So you can see some revisions against some of the oldest ones. You can compare and see which pipelines were updated between them. I think it is very helpful to both sides, the technical and business teams."
"There are some limitations with Informatica Axon when one tries to connect or integrate it with Jira."
"The solution should improve its integration."
"Permissions, scalability, and connection with other informatic tools are the main areas that need development. Integration with other tools, such as IDQ, is challenging. The management of data discovery is highly challenging because many data points have identical definitions."
"Informatica Axon needs more integration connectors so that it can connect to systems and different kinds of datasets."
"The on-prem version's functionalities may not be available on the cloud version."
"Some functionalities can be a challenge in the cloud."
"They could improve technical support because it is not good enough at the moment."
"I would like to see more API integration to have the capability to build a report using other third party reporting tools to streamline the operation."
"I would like to have some kind of API where I could call this object and the revision that I want and the same object and another revision that I wanted to compare with. And I could not see it as some API in MANTA Flow, and we have this feature on the user interface."
"One area of improvement for MANTA Flow is to add as many new data sources as possible. We have found that maybe they can support 100, but not 101, unfortunately."
Informatica Axon is ranked 3rd in Data Governance with 23 reviews while MANTA Flow is ranked 18th in Data Governance with 2 reviews. Informatica Axon is rated 7.8, while MANTA Flow is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Informatica Axon writes "It has a marketplace that allows you to showcase all the assets the data owner has". On the other hand, the top reviewer of MANTA Flow writes "Very Powerful, with cloud based scalability, and highly efficient for both business and technical teams". Informatica Axon is most compared with Microsoft Purview, Collibra Governance, Alation Data Catalog, BigID and erwin Data Intelligence by Quest, whereas MANTA Flow is most compared with Collibra Lineage, Microsoft Purview and Alation Data Catalog.
See our list of best Data Governance vendors.
We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.