Instana Dynamic APM vs Sentry comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Instana Logo
4,014 views|3,178 comparisons
81% willing to recommend
Sentry Logo
8,877 views|7,865 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary
Updated on Jul 4, 2023

We performed a comparison between Instana Dynamic APM and Sentry based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.

Features: Instana Dynamic APM offers real-time data generation and quick implementation. Sentry excels in accuracy and seamlessly integrates with different tools. Instana primarily focuses on monitoring and detection, whereas Sentry prioritizes error management and comprehensive context tracking.

Instana Dynamic APM has room for improvement in terms of integration with plugins or an open API, synthetic monitoring, AI-based anomaly detection, API and end-user experience monitoring, and issue detailing and history playback. Sentry could enhance its issue creation process, tracking capabilities, integration with other platforms, pricing, event customization, alert policies and conditions, administrator settings, role registration feature, cloud platform integration, and debugging and end-to-end tracing capabilities.

Service and Support: The customer service of Instana Dynamic APM receives varying feedback, with some customers expressing concerns about support. Sentry's customer service is not frequently mentioned, however, customers appreciate their helpful community support forums and documentation.

Ease of Deployment: Users find Sentry's initial setup to be uncomplicated and flexible, offering both standard and customized options. Conversely, the setup process for Instana Dynamic APM is praised for its speed, simplicity, and efficiency, featuring automated dashboards that are instantly accessible upon installation.

Pricing: Sentry provides a free plan for initial projects, and users appreciate the reasonable pricing, especially given the features in the open-source version. In contrast, Instana Dynamic APM's pricing is generally competitive, although some users find it slightly higher compared to other vendors.

ROI: Instana Dynamic APM and Sentry have both demonstrated positive financial gains and offer value to users. That said, they differ in terms of outcomes and benefits provided.

Comparison Results: Instana Dynamic APM is the preferred choice over Sentry. Instana is praised for its quick and simple setup process, real-time data generation, user-friendly interface, and comprehensive monitoring abilities. Users recommend improvements such as better integration, additional synthetic monitoring and anomaly detection features, and enhancements to API and end-user experience monitoring.

To learn more, read our detailed Instana Dynamic APM vs. Sentry Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Sometimes it's able to provide a proper RCA on its own. It's able to correlate different events that occurred and that becomes like an RCA in itself.""Its GUI is really good and it easy to understand for non-technical users.""It is a stable solution.""The most valuable feature of Instana Dynamic APM is auto-instrumentation.""The overall capabilities are the most valuable.""The detailing of our application behavior and user experience is most valuable. In case there is an issue, we typically use Instana to figure it out. We can drill down to the application and figure out what's going on and where the issue is.""With Instana, the interface and the UI are very simple to use.""If a key monitored value has crossed a threshold, it sends out an alert. And the solution is able to intelligently find out if something is beyond the range that it normally resides in."

More Instana Dynamic APM Pros →

"Great for capturing application performance metrics and error logs.""The product performs well.""Sentry breaks everything down in real time.""Sentry is more accurate than some other tools such as Datadog because it has more integration with Slack, GitLab, Jira, or other ticketing tools.""The most valuable feature is the ability to create and assign rules and give access to particular users.""Its initial setup process is relatively straightforward.""It's a great visibility tool for the developer team.""The stability is very good for Sentry and in general works well."

More Sentry Pros →

Cons
"We should be able to go back to scenarios during or before the issue. There should be something like a history playback. Such a feature or functionality would be good.""The App Connect middleware does not integrate with or show corresponding sub nodes.""Maybe log monitoring could be better.""New Relic has a better UI in terms of how it presents the data.""Many managers, as well as our customers, used to ask for reports, such as "top X number of queries that are slow," or "top pages that have the highest number of issues." This is something that can be improved by Instana. Currently, they don't have that kind of reporting available out-of-the-box.""The configuration of Instana Dynamic APM needs improvement because it requires quite a bit of work.""Its SLI and SLA features need improvement in setting up alerts.""While it is already quite good, there is room for improvement in terms of providing better functionality"

More Instana Dynamic APM Cons →

"To deal with its shortcomings, Sentry needs to continuously improve in areas like the user interface and documentation, apart from its other features.""We cannot restrict particular columns on particular data. It would be helpful if that feature was improved.""Its debugging feature needs to be faster.""The settings for an administrator are complex.""I would like to see a role registration feature added.""It would be nice if the product provided a map showing the users’ geographic location.""It should be easier to integrate Sentry with other tools, and the end-to-end tracing capabilities could be improved.""The price could be lowered."

More Sentry Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Pricing is quite competitive. Dynatrace, AppDynamics, and New Relic were all several times more expensive than Instana, both the on-prem and the SaaS versions. Price-wise they are a lot more competitive than anyone else out there."
  • "Its pricing isn't a big pain point. Its pricing seems to be better than some of the other competing products in the market, but they also have some of the features and functionalities that are better than Instana."
  • "The pricing is $1,200 per year which is a bit high compared to other vendors."
  • "The solution is less expensive than one of its competitors."
  • "It's reasonably priced and manageable, especially for individuals who grasp the significance of application monitoring."
  • "The solution's pricing is comparable to other products."
  • "Instana Dynamic APM is more affordable for small and medium-sized companies compared to other vendors."
  • More Instana Dynamic APM Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Currently, we are in the production phase of our project and we are on free plans to use Sentry. Once we go live we will have to be on a subscription-based plan."
  • "I am currently using a self-hosted open version."
  • "We are currently paying through Cloudera for the Sentry service."
  • "We can adjust the price a little bit based on our needs."
  • More Sentry Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
    768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The platform’s most valuable feature is the ability to monitor the performance of containers for request and response analysis.
    Top Answer:Instana Dynamic APM is more affordable for small and medium-sized companies compared to AppDynamics and Dynatrace.
    Top Answer:They could improve the product’s dashboards and provide more dashboard options. Additionally, the server and database monitoring needs enhancement compared to other vendors.
    Top Answer:The product costs $26 a month if we choose a yearly subscription. Code coverage can be added for an additional $29 per month. The Team plan is the cheapest package available. We can make our own… more »
    Top Answer:It would be nice if the product provided a map showing the users’ geographic location.
    Ranking
    Views
    4,014
    Comparisons
    3,178
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    328
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    8,877
    Comparisons
    7,865
    Reviews
    10
    Average Words per Review
    380
    Rating
    8.5
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Sentry
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Instana’s Enterprise Observability Platform, powered by automated Application Performance Monitoring, discovers and maps all services, infrastructure, and their inter-dependencies automatically. Instana ingests all observability metrics, traces each request, profiles every process, and updates application dependency maps in real-time to deliver the context and actionable feedback needed by Dev+Ops to optimize application performance, enable innovation, and mitigate risk to help them add value and efficiency to the pipeline. Learn more at https://instana.com.

    Sentry’s real-time error tracking gives you insight into production deployments and information to reproduce and fix crashes.

    Sample Customers
    Daxko Lifts Fitness Studios Through COVID Regulations with Quick Engineering PivotsAltissia Meets SLAs to Support Student DeadlinesImmocloud Unlocks Observability to Modernize Real EstateEnento Group Boosts Service Reliability with Real-Time Visibility into Application Performance Instana’s Observability for Amazon EKS Helps Yara Deliver Digital Farming Solutions
    Dropbox, Airbnb, Stripe, Uber
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise42%
    Large Enterprise33%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise69%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business70%
    Large Enterprise30%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise50%
    Buyer's Guide
    Instana Dynamic APM vs. Sentry
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Instana Dynamic APM vs. Sentry and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Instana Dynamic APM is ranked 20th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 12 reviews while Sentry is ranked 8th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 11 reviews. Instana Dynamic APM is rated 7.4, while Sentry is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Instana Dynamic APM writes "A really good GUI that is easy for non-technical users to understand". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sentry writes "An easy-to-use solution that has a good dashboard, performs well, and provides flexible pricing". Instana Dynamic APM is most compared with Dynatrace, AppDynamics, New Relic, IBM Application Performance Management and Grafana, whereas Sentry is most compared with Azure Monitor, Grafana, Elastic Observability, New Relic and Datadog. See our Instana Dynamic APM vs. Sentry report.

    See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

    We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.