Compare ITM Platform vs. SAP Portfolio and Project Management

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Planview, Broadcom, Microsoft and others in Project Portfolio Management. Updated: September 2021.
536,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"We are on the Flex licenses.""We have unlimited licenses for all of our functionalities. Since we went global, we went with that model.""The cost of other pieces and integrating them in needs improvement.""We have portfolio managers, resource managers, project managers, and time reporting licenses. These are the licenses that we have.""I don't think we have necessarily purchased everything that I would have liked to have seen.""We have several hundred licenses. It costs us several hundred thousand dollars a year.""We overbought our licenses. We looked at our needs three to four years down the road and tried based our contract on that. However, we were over aggressive. We use about a third of the licenses that we have. We're looking to adjust the makeup so we can start utilizing the amount of money that we are spending. Right now, we're overspending, and my organization is not seeing the value in Planview because we are paying so much for licenses that we're not using.""Our licensing costs are probably $150,000 to $180,000 a year with 270 licenses total."

More Planview Enterprise One Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs.
536,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: We have a department for software development, and it would be valuable if SAP integrated seamlessly with some products… more »
Top Answer: We mostly use it for project management, portfolio management, demand management, and resource management of projects.
Top Answer: The integration portion with SAP models is valuable.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Troux
Portfolio and Project Management
Learn More
Overview
Planview Enterprise, Planview's performance management platform, combines project and portfolio management software with adaptive best practices. By integrating the business process management of strategies, services, and projects within a single, Web-based solution, Planview empowers organizations to achieve greater levels of control over their ever-changing environment by dynamically managing money, resources, and capacities.

ITM Platform is the Project Portfolio Management software that bridges the gap between strategy and project management. With a mere two-week integration and an easy learning curve, you and your team members will be fully operational fast, giving you the project and work management tools you need to align your portfolio with the overall business strategy.

Offering powerful tools that allow you to manage all components at portfolio, program, project, and task levels, ITM Platform makes it easy to oversee agile and waterfall projects, prioritize the unique needs and requirements of your business, and use real-time information to report progress to key players.

Portfolio Management integrates information from existing project management, human resources, and financial systems to provide an overview of the project portfolio with easy drilldown to details for portfolio managers, project managers, and resource managers. This enables innovative and collaborative, cross-functional business processes. Project Management covers the entire range of project management activities in development and consultancy projects, from planning to implementation to project completion.
Offer
Learn more about Planview Enterprise One
Learn more about ITM Platform
Learn more about SAP Portfolio and Project Management
Sample Customers
Zurich Insurance Group, Zumbotel Group, Carphone Warehouse
LOEWE, Accor Hotels, Elavon, ProPay, EHC Global, MacMillan, Baumer
Joy Global Inc., Citrix, EMC Corporation, Concho Resources, Concho Resources, RZD Russian Railways, Family Dollar Stores Inc., Lenovo
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm24%
Insurance Company22%
Pharma/Biotech Company10%
Manufacturing Company10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company27%
Comms Service Provider13%
Financial Services Firm8%
Government8%
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company24%
Comms Service Provider15%
Energy/Utilities Company10%
Manufacturing Company10%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business6%
Midsize Enterprise4%
Large Enterprise91%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business5%
Midsize Enterprise24%
Large Enterprise71%
No Data Available
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Planview, Broadcom, Microsoft and others in Project Portfolio Management. Updated: September 2021.
536,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

ITM Platform is ranked 20th in Project Portfolio Management while SAP Portfolio and Project Management is ranked 8th in Project Portfolio Management with 1 review. ITM Platform is rated 0.0, while SAP Portfolio and Project Management is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Portfolio and Project Management writes "Integrates well with SAP models, but doesn't integrate with performance trackers like Jira". ITM Platform is most compared with Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management (PPM), whereas SAP Portfolio and Project Management is most compared with Microsoft Project Server, Jira, Planisware and Artemis Enterprise.

See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors.

We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.