We performed a comparison between NetBeans and TeamCity based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub, Amazon Web Services (AWS), JetBrains and others in IDE."Large scale of projects, templates, and coding support."
"When you have to develop in Java, this IDE is ideal because it has many plugins that make your life easier... For example, when working with Hibernate or with JPA, creating entities is very easy through a graphical interface."
"Server Support"
"C++ 11 support (for a long time)"
"It is easy to deploy, manage servers, and ORMS resources."
"One of the most important features is that Apache Maven supports it."
"It comes out of package fully-loaded with a lot of great features for web development."
"The learning curve is easy and fast because the interface is simple and intuitive, enabling us to easily train developers who are not expert in metrics."
"Using TeamCity and emailing everyone on fail is one way to emphasize the importance of testing code and showing management why taking the time to test actually does saves time from having to fix bugs on the other end."
"VCS Trigger: Provides excellent source control support."
"TeamCity is very useful due to the fact that it has a strong plug-in system."
"Time to deployment has been reduced in situations where we want to deploy to production or deploy breaking changes."
"TeamCity is a very user-friendly tool."
"Good integration with IDE and JetBrains products."
"The flexibility of TeamCity allows it to fit in workflows that I have yet to imagine."
"We would like to see better integration with other version controls, since we encountered difficulty when this we first attempted."
"I would like there to be better integration with Git, as there are IDEs such as Eclipse that offer this integration in a much more elegant way than NetBeans."
"One of main areas that the tool can improve is performance."
"There are always rooms for improvement for any product. The good thing with NetBeans is that since it is Open Source, you can just go ahead and contribute whatever you want to change yourself."
"Background scanning of sources on demand, disallowed by Options (processor usage, build cannot be deleted by the old version build)."
"Debugging: Watches, Evaluate Expression, and data inspection are limited."
"t is a very heavy load on the computer, especially when you compare with Sublime Text Limited plugins and themes."
"The debugging mechanize could be improved compared to IntelliJ, for example."
"If there was more documentation that was easier to locate, it would be helpful for users."
"It will benefit this solution if they keep up to date with other CI/CD systems out there."
"Last time I used it, dotnet compilation had to be done via PowerShell scripts. There was actually a lot that had to be scripted."
"The UI for this solution could be improved. New users don't find it easy to navigate. The need some level of training to understand the ins and the outs."
"If TeamCity could create more out of the box solutions to make it more user friendly and create more use cases, that would be ideal."
"I would suggest creating simple and advanced configurations. Advanced configurations will give more customizations like Jenkins does."
"The upgrade process could be smoother. Upgrading major versions can often cause some pain."
"REST API support lacks many features in customization of builds, jobs, and settings."
Earn 20 points
NetBeans is ranked 6th in IDE while TeamCity is ranked 6th in Build Automation with 25 reviews. NetBeans is rated 8.2, while TeamCity is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of NetBeans writes "No additional configuration is needed, just checkout projects from the VCS server and open it". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TeamCity writes "Build management system used to successfully create full request tests and run security scans". NetBeans is most compared with Replit, Codeium , Codespaces, SonarLint and Oracle SQL Developer, whereas TeamCity is most compared with GitLab, CircleCI, Jenkins, Harness and GitHub Actions.
We monitor all IDE reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
