We performed a comparison between LeanIX and QualiWare X based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about LeanIX, Sparx Systems, erwin by Quest and others in Enterprise Architecture Management."We've been able to develop some nice looking reports, and the dashboard's capability to map is very easy compared to Enterprise Architect."
"LeanIX has good usability and stability. This SaaS is intuitive, easy to use, and comes with a nice reporting feature."
"The solution has a very useful assessment tool that automatically populates from input data to produce a detailed analysis of customer's environments."
"The most valuable features are that it's user-friendly and the user experience. It's easy to map the fact sheets."
"Ease of use is the most valuable feature. From an enterprise architecture perspective, it's not too cumbersome with too many functionalities, yet it has a lot of attributes for the content it covers."
"Interfaces well with downstream systems of data."
"I like LeanIX's ease of use in general."
"Among the most valuable features are the easy-to-use interface and the ability to get quick results... Many tools that I have seen are great for technical people and for giving technical and business information as well, but they're not as friendly and easy as LeanIX... It works well for both technical and business users. It provides a good combination, enabling you to quickly put valuable information in for both technical and non-technical people and derive results."
"I like the solution's traceability."
"The initial setup has room for improvement."
"Does a poor job of being able to allocate detailed costings to components within the network."
"What would make LeanIX better is more variety in terms of reporting, and more flexibility with its data importing feature."
"The solution needs to incorporate a data patch tool that moves within and irons data."
"It would be beneficial to have additional features and capabilities to enhance mapping between applications, especially across domains where the relationships may not be direct."
"Not a ten because you always have that gap between complexity and easy to use. And the more complex the tool becomes, the more difficult it is to get the usability."
"They could include a combination of LeanIX and some modeling extensions."
"They should improve the out of the box connectors that they provide. They should see if clients are really ready to adapt them."
"The solution is not easy and intuitive to use. I would also like the software to have a reference metamodel that can guide the modeling."
LeanIX is ranked 1st in Enterprise Architecture Management with 16 reviews while QualiWare X is ranked 23rd in Enterprise Architecture Management with 3 reviews. LeanIX is rated 8.6, while QualiWare X is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of LeanIX writes "Streamlines the process of identifying apps nearing end-of-life or requiring retirement and facilitates informed decisions about app retention". On the other hand, the top reviewer of QualiWare X writes "Works as a reference for architecture but not very intuitive ". LeanIX is most compared with ServiceNow, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, MEGA HOPEX, ADOIT and iServer, whereas QualiWare X is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, iServer, Avolution ABACUS and ARIS Cloud.
See our list of best Enterprise Architecture Management vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
