Compare LogRhythm NetMon vs. Tenable SecurityCenter Continuous View

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about LogRhythm NetMon vs. Tenable SecurityCenter Continuous View and other solutions. Updated: November 2020.
448,542 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The analytics feature is the most valuable feature.""Visibility is a valuable feature, the ability to see even if the traffic is not going into the firewall""The most valuable feature is the log, which can be analyzed by our SIEM solution."

More LogRhythm NetMon Pros »

"The first of the valuable features is how easy it is to access all of the information that's gathered from the assessments... With a lot of other technologies, like Rapid7, if you're using Nexpose you effectively have to be a DBA to get some of the lower-level results from the scans. And Qualys wasn't very intuitive.""The next big one is supportability. In a large enterprise, we have many types of technologies. The technology we previously had didn't even support authentication to a lot of those technologies.""The scanning itself is really the core of the tool, and it's what we're most interested in."

More Tenable SecurityCenter Continuous View Pros »

Cons
"I would like to see better integration with multiple products. Integration is not something that is readily available for most of the products.""Could use a topology diagram which would help get an exact visual.""The training for this product is not very good and needs to be improved."

More LogRhythm NetMon Cons »

"When it comes to... dynamic application scanning, I think they are lagging behind the curve. They have a lackluster solution, to the point where I think they need to determine, as a company, whether or not that's a space they even want to play in.""There are certain circumstances where they may have found a vulnerable service and they just removed the service completely from the device because nobody was using it. There's no way to go into SecurityCenter and mark it, to say, "This is no longer an issue. It doesn't exist anymore." Or, "The risk was accepted for one year, so let's not report it as 'high' until that one year period is done." The handling of operational flow around vulnerability management could be improved."

More Tenable SecurityCenter Continuous View Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Pricing is okay. There were some competitors that were extremely expensive and there were some which were really inexpensive but LogRhythm stayed in the middle of them.""The price of this solution is too high, so it should be made more practical and more valuable for the customer."

More LogRhythm NetMon Pricing and Cost Advice »

"We did a three-year deal where the cost is amortized over the three years. The Elite Support was an additional cost to the standard licensing fees... If you use Security Center, most of the time it is on-premise, so you're going to have some sort of infrastructure to build out and there's going to be a cost associated with that."

More Tenable SecurityCenter Continuous View Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
448,542 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The most valuable feature is the log, which can be analyzed by our SIEM solution.
Top Answer: The price of this solution is too high, so it should be made more practical and more valuable for the customer.
Top Answer: The training for this product is not very good and needs to be improved. For example, the instructor came with a specific outline and does not like to go outside of the box. There should be… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
45th
Views
1,686
Comparisons
1,219
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
472
Avg. Rating
7.3
34th
Views
1,036
Comparisons
737
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
2,280
Avg. Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Also Known As
LogRhythm Network Monitor SecurityCenter Continuous View, SecurityCenter CV
Learn
LogRhythm
Tenable Network Security
Overview

Identify Emerging Threats on Your Network in Real Time

Transform your physical or virtual system into a network forensics sensor in a matter of minutes for free with LogRhythm's NetMon Freemium. Your investigations will come together effortlessly with extensive corresponding metadata, full packet capture, and customizable advanced correlation.. Detect network-based threats with real-time network monitoring and big data analytics

Get the visibility you need with NetMon.

SecurityCenter Continuous View is the market-leading continuous network monitoring platform. It integrates SecurityCenter along with multiple Nessus Network Monitor sensors and Log Correlation Engine (LCE) to provide comprehensive continuous network monitoring.

Offer
Learn more about LogRhythm NetMon
Learn more about Tenable SecurityCenter Continuous View
Sample Customers
Sera-BrynnMethodist Healthcare Ministries
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider21%
Retailer9%
Wholesaler/Distributor5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider30%
Computer Software Company20%
Government11%
Media Company7%
Find out what your peers are saying about LogRhythm NetMon vs. Tenable SecurityCenter Continuous View and other solutions. Updated: November 2020.
448,542 professionals have used our research since 2012.

LogRhythm NetMon is ranked 45th in Network Monitoring Software with 3 reviews while Tenable SecurityCenter Continuous View is ranked 34th in Network Monitoring Software with 2 reviews. LogRhythm NetMon is rated 7.4, while Tenable SecurityCenter Continuous View is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of LogRhythm NetMon writes "Provides very good lateral visibility for easy detection of irregular traffic and attacks". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable SecurityCenter Continuous View writes "Provides the best network-based vulnerability scanning, but the dynamic scanning is lackluster". LogRhythm NetMon is most compared with Cisco Stealthwatch, SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer, Meraki Dashboard, ConnectWise Automate and SolarWinds NPM, whereas Tenable SecurityCenter Continuous View is most compared with Cisco Stealthwatch, ManageEngine OpManager, SCOM, Fortinet FortiSIEM and Nagios Core. See our LogRhythm NetMon vs. Tenable SecurityCenter Continuous View report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.