We performed a comparison between LogRhythm NetworkXDR [EOL] and Trend Micro Deep Discovery based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Darktrace, Vectra AI, Cisco and others in Network Detection and Response (NDR)."What we like most in LogRhythm NetworkXDR is its GUI. The GUI is the best when compared to competitors. For example, there is another SIEM in QRadar and Splunk, and for open source SIEM there is Wazuh and there are other SIEM solutions, but LogRhythm NetworkXDR is more reliable and easier to access. It's easy to use and its display is easy to understand. Learning LogRhythm NetworkXDR is smooth sailing compared to other SIEM solutions."
"The performance and stability are great."
"The most valuable feature is that the user can customize images of virtual machines in the sandbox functionality. The other vendors only use images that were created by the vendor but not the customer, end-user or partner. This helps to detect advanced threats and attacks."
"It is a very good solution. It is very light, and it is quite quick to figure out the problem in your network."
"The most valuable feature of Trend Micro Deep Discovery is its complete end-to-end visibility of threats."
"I like the sales operations testing. and support."
"The HTML file sandboxing is very good."
"As a security product, managing threats is crucial for my clients."
"The most valuable features are the protection and that it is fast."
"What would make LogRhythm NetworkXDR better is if they could run it open source, similar to what is being done in Wazuh, and Wazuh is also a good tool to compare against. More integration could also make LogRhythm NetworkXDR better."
"The solution needs improvement in terms of pricing."
"There are certain aspects of flexibility in the policies that should be added to Deep Discovery."
"Trend Micro Deep Discovery's technical support could be improved, and it could be made more active."
"The stability of the solution could be improved. It should be 100% stable, but it's not there right now."
"I would like the ability to analyze all files in our internal network, at the same time on different operating systems. Not just three of them, but as many as possible."
"Some of the end users may not be technically proficient, so they occasionally face problems due to a lack of knowledge."
"I would like to see integration with third-party tools to improve the visibility of the dashboards."
"The solution could be more stable and offer more security."
LogRhythm NetworkXDR [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Network Detection and Response (NDR) with 1 review while Trend Micro Deep Discovery is ranked 8th in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) with 22 reviews. LogRhythm NetworkXDR [EOL] is rated 10.0, while Trend Micro Deep Discovery is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of LogRhythm NetworkXDR [EOL] writes "Easier to learn, access, and use, and comes with an easy to understand GUI". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Micro Deep Discovery writes "Good threat detection capabilities and offers flexibility for hosting options". LogRhythm NetworkXDR [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Trend Micro Deep Discovery is most compared with Darktrace, Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System, Arista NDR, Vectra AI and Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention.
We monitor all Network Detection and Response (NDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.