We performed a comparison between LogRhythm NetworkXDR [EOL] and Trend Micro Deep Discovery based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Darktrace, Vectra AI, Cisco and others in Network Detection and Response (NDR)."What we like most in LogRhythm NetworkXDR is its GUI. The GUI is the best when compared to competitors. For example, there is another SIEM in QRadar and Splunk, and for open source SIEM there is Wazuh and there are other SIEM solutions, but LogRhythm NetworkXDR is more reliable and easier to access. It's easy to use and its display is easy to understand. Learning LogRhythm NetworkXDR is smooth sailing compared to other SIEM solutions."
"Generally speaking, it just gives us a broad understanding of exactly what kind of threats occur. The submission point, analyzing point, and virtualization are within the environment that it supports. It helped us to improve our security levels and protect our internal network from any threats outside."
"Trend Micro Deep Discovery is a very specific product for threat intelligence with smart protection."
"The performance and stability are great."
"The platform provides all essential features for discovery and administration."
"The most valuable feature of Trend Micro Deep Discovery is its complete end-to-end visibility of threats."
"The HTML file sandboxing is very good."
"The solution has extension-based features that help it to analyze the environment. The environment can have different platforms like Windows, Linux, and Mac. The tool will give a report which can confirm the analysis of the issues. You can also get clear information on threats or suspicious files."
"One of the most valuable features is the performance, since, so far, we have not faced any issues with Deep Discovery."
"What would make LogRhythm NetworkXDR better is if they could run it open source, similar to what is being done in Wazuh, and Wazuh is also a good tool to compare against. More integration could also make LogRhythm NetworkXDR better."
"The solution could be more stable and offer more security."
"Deep Discovery is easy to manage, but there is still room for improvement on the administration and operations side. Competing products have a cleaner interface that makes it easier to manage their products. Trend Micro offers a lot of features in one product suite, but it can be unwieldy for the customer to manage all that with a single interface."
"The scalability is sometimes limited."
"The stability of the solution could be improved. It should be 100% stable, but it's not there right now."
"The solution needs improvement in terms of pricing."
"This solution could be improved with faster technical support and cheaper licensing prices."
"I would like the ability to analyze all files in our internal network, at the same time on different operating systems. Not just three of them, but as many as possible."
"The product's security features need enhancement."
LogRhythm NetworkXDR [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Network Detection and Response (NDR) with 1 review while Trend Micro Deep Discovery is ranked 8th in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) with 22 reviews. LogRhythm NetworkXDR [EOL] is rated 10.0, while Trend Micro Deep Discovery is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of LogRhythm NetworkXDR [EOL] writes "Easier to learn, access, and use, and comes with an easy to understand GUI". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Micro Deep Discovery writes "Good threat detection capabilities and offers flexibility for hosting options". LogRhythm NetworkXDR [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Trend Micro Deep Discovery is most compared with Darktrace, Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System, Arista NDR, Vectra AI and Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention.
We monitor all Network Detection and Response (NDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
