• Home
  • MarketingPilot [EOL] vs. Siebel Marketing Resource Management

MarketingPilot [EOL] vs Siebel Marketing Resource Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
Unranked
In Marketing Resource Management
4th
out of 15 in Marketing Resource Management
Views
94
Comparisons
80
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Learn More
Microsoft
Oracle
Overview
Powerful and comprehensive integrated marketing management system for corporate marketing departments and in-house agencies.
Oracle's Siebel Marketing Resource Management is a complete solution for planning, budgeting, executing, and measuring the impact of global marketing efforts. It provides a common language, powerful analytics, and business processes based on best practices. Siebel MRM automates key processes, from planning to financial analysis, helping marketing users across the enterprise manage activities more effectively and optimize the use of marketing resources.
Sample Customers
PGA Tour
Hover Automotive India Pvt. Ltd., Southwest Airlines Co., Lawn Tennis Association, Grupo Arcor, BoxFusion, ec4u expert consulting AG, Telekom Deutschland GmbH, SMSA Express Transportation Company Ltd., Smiles S.A.

MarketingPilot [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Marketing Resource Management while Siebel Marketing Resource Management is ranked 4th in Marketing Resource Management. MarketingPilot [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Siebel Marketing Resource Management is rated 0.0. On the other hand, MarketingPilot [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Siebel Marketing Resource Management is most compared with Salesforce Marketing Cloud, Adobe Campaign and SAS Marketing Automation.

See our list of best Marketing Resource Management vendors.

We monitor all Marketing Resource Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.