Compare MATS vs. OutSystems

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
MATS Logo
61 views|24 comparisons
OutSystems Logo
9,788 views|7,153 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about ServiceNow, Pega, Microsoft and others in Rapid Application Development Software. Updated: June 2021.
509,570 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"For a single application, it's too expensive.""OutSystems is a good solution, but it's not cheap.""I think the pricing for OutSystems is comparable with similar solutions. I would place it somewhere in the middle. We pay for the bundle and don't pay anything extra in terms of licensing and other fees."

More OutSystems Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.
509,570 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: There is literally a ton of stuff it can do. It's very flexible.
Top Answer: The cost of the product is very high and would price out smaller organizations. My client pays for the solution. Therefore, I have no visibility of the cost. I can't speak to the licensing or the… more »
Top Answer: The solution is costly. The solution is still very new to me, and it's therefore hard for me to discuss missing features. I'm still learning and discovering.
Ranking
Views
61
Comparisons
24
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
9,788
Comparisons
7,153
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
777
Rating
7.8
Popular Comparisons
Learn More
MatsSoft
Video Not Available
Overview

MATS is a new breed of "Low-code" BPM software that's quick to learn, easy to use and requires less IT. By using its drag-and-drop interface to configure, rather than code, you can build a new app faster than you can brief IT to do it for you.

OutSystems is the number one platform for low-code rapid application development. Thousands of customers worldwide trust OutSystems as only solution that combines the power of low-code development with advanced mobile capabilities, enabling visual development of entire application portfolios that easily integrate with existing systems.
Offer
Learn more about MATS
Learn more about OutSystems
Sample Customers
ITV, Thomas Cook, Mott MacDonald, Accord Mortgages, Nationwide, Roll Back Malaria, Coca Cola, FedEx, Intel, RBS, Vodafone, Barclaycard
Randstad, Warner Brothers, HP, Intel, ING, Banco Popular, Thrivent Financial, Bacardi, Kent State University, Bacardi, FICO, ING, Vodafone, AbbVie, Estafeta, Siemens, Vopak
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider21%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
Retailer5%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business20%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise67%
Find out what your peers are saying about ServiceNow, Pega, Microsoft and others in Rapid Application Development Software. Updated: June 2021.
509,570 professionals have used our research since 2012.

MATS is ranked 42nd in Rapid Application Development Software while OutSystems is ranked 9th in Rapid Application Development Software with 6 reviews. MATS is rated 0.0, while OutSystems is rated 7.8. On the other hand, the top reviewer of OutSystems writes "Great platform, very stable and it does automatic dependency checking: very useful for enterprise environments". MATS is most compared with , whereas OutSystems is most compared with Microsoft PowerApps, Mendix, Appian, ServiceNow and Pega BPM.

See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.