We performed a comparison between Meraki MX and Stormshield Network Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Sophos, Cisco, WatchGuard and others in Unified Threat Management (UTM)."It is very fast to implement."
"MX is easy to manage, configure and install."
"I think cloud management is key. The cloud management and support are the two things that make the product great."
"They have very good technical support and I have relied heavily on them."
"WAN optimization is the best feature of the solution."
"Deployment takes no more than one working day."
"The features we have found most valuable are the firewall and the monitoring tools."
"The initial setup for me was straightforward."
"The scalability of the solution is good."
"This solution is quick and easy to configure."
"The solution has improved my organization because I can see what traffic is happening and I can use it to block and prevent attacks."
"Our organization's main concern is stability, and this is a stable solution."
"I can see what traffic is going on. I can easily block any programs from attacks."
"The most valuable features are the IPS, the firewall function, and the price."
"Ease of use is the best feature of the product."
"Easily manageable in a variety of environments."
"We have been having a problem with the VPN. When the energy goes down and is back again, the VPN link doesn't get established. We have to manually turn off the modems and other pieces of equipment and manually establish the VPN. It has been around one month since we have been having this problem, and we don't have enough support from Meraki to solve the problem."
"Load balancing options and ability to manage a couple of Internet connections."
"The product could incorporate tools like ThousandEyes into the system so we can see things directly."
"The problem is that the two licenses do not currently integrate. We have to create separate companies and do an interconnection."
"The solution's pricing should be reduced."
"It would be nice if the different services, including the SIEM SOC and endpoint detection and response (EDR) were integrated into one, so that I don't have to go to different vendors for different services."
"The client-side VPN is weak. The product could be improved with deployment templates."
"It would be nice to get detailed logging information without third-party software."
"The product must improve its pricing."
"Improvement is needed in terms of the technical support of the manufacturer."
"The SD card could be more secure."
"The biggest issue was their support department was not able to help us, then everything stops. This is a no-go area for me."
"This solution has a big problem with web filtering and it needs to be improved."
"With Stormshield, there are difficulties joining things, and it can be complex depending on the architecture."
"This is not a next-generation firewall."
"A more user-friendly interface would be helpful."
Meraki MX is ranked 2nd in Unified Threat Management (UTM) with 57 reviews while Stormshield Network Security is ranked 9th in Unified Threat Management (UTM) with 16 reviews. Meraki MX is rated 8.2, while Stormshield Network Security is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Meraki MX writes "Cost-effective, simplified, easy to manage, and reliable with advanced security features and granular visibility". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Stormshield Network Security writes "Handles monitoring, collection, analysis, and reporting of data in our HQ and branches". Meraki MX is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls, Cisco Secure Firewall, Sophos XG and SonicWall TZ, whereas Stormshield Network Security is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, Netgate pfSense, OPNsense, Sophos XG and Zyxel Unified Security Gateway.
See our list of best Unified Threat Management (UTM) vendors.
We monitor all Unified Threat Management (UTM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.