Compare Meraki MX vs. Zyxel Unified Security Gateway
Sponsored | ||
 |
Most Helpful Review | ||||||
|
| Use Zyxel Unified Security Gateway? Share your opinion. | ||||
 Find out what your peers are saying about Sophos, WatchGuard, Cisco and others in Unified Threat Management (UTM). Updated: January 2021. 456,719 professionals have used our research since 2012. | ||||||
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice | ||
"Licensing is expensive compared to other solutions." "The cost is a big factor for us. This is why we are using it only in our restricted area. They are very much higher than their competitors in the market." "We paid about $7,000 for the Cisco firewall, plus another small Cisco router and the lead switch. It was under the combined license. It's a final agreement." "Watch out for hidden licensing and incredibly high annual maintenance costs." "I bought a license for three years and it was really affordable." "With AnyConnect, it depends on your license. It depends on the number of concurrent users you want to connect." "This solution might be expensive, but it is economical in the long run." "Some of our customers would be more likely to standardize on Cisco equipment if the cost was lower because a lot of people install cheap equipment." | "Pricing varies as per the type of license." "Meraki is also expensive, but it's a little bit less expensive and it's easier to configure than Cisco ASA." "The price varies depending on the hardware platform as well as the type of license and whether you're adding security or not." "The license cost depends on the box. We acquired a different product line. We are dealing with MX appliance now, that is, MX6, MX54, MX100, MX250, MX450. Every box has got an identity, and it has got its own specification. Every box has got a different license fee. We deployed Meraki MX in UAE when it was not a mature product. We took a risk, but we were successful. We saved a huge amount of money after implementing and removing all the MPLS and leased lines. We got a broadband connection because Meraki MX could work on a broadband connection. We have drastically saved a very good amount of money, which was one of the successful things apart from the successful solution." "Other content filtering solutions that I have used had more bells and whistles, but given the cost, complexity, and management overhead, I am very pleased with Meraki’s solution." "The price is slightly increased, but reasonable." "It is a good global solution in terms of the price and features, but because we sell this solution in dollars, sometimes we don't get to sell this solution in Brazil because the dollar is very expensive. The price of every project is different. It varies depending upon the project, scenario, and client." "The pricing could always be improved — especially with the shape the economy is in at the moment." | "This gateway is pretty cheap." More Zyxel Unified Security Gateway Pricing and Cost Advice » |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Unified Threat Management (UTM) solutions are best for your needs. 456,719 professionals have used our research since 2012. | ||
Questions from the Community | ||
Top Answer:
When you compare these
firewalls you can identify them with different features, advantages,
practices and… more » Top Answer: Cisco FW for peace of mind Top Answer: They provide DDoS protection and multi-factor authentication. That is a good option as it enables work-from-home… more » | Top Answer: definitely the FortiGate , I can assist you with configuration and support if needed .
| Ask a question Earn 20 points |
Popular Comparisons | ||
 Compared 34% of the time.  Compared 15% of the time.  Compared 5% of the time.  Compared 5% of the time.  Compared 4% of the time. | Compared 35% of the time. Compared 7% of the time. Compared 7% of the time.  Compared 7% of the time. Compared 6% of the time. | Compared 20% of the time. Compared 15% of the time.  Compared 12% of the time. Compared 11% of the time.  Compared 2% of the time. |
Also Known As | ||
| Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Firewall, Cisco ASA NGFW, Cisco ASA, Adaptive Security Appliance, ASA, Cisco Sourcefire Firewalls, Cisco ASAv | MX64, MX64W, MX84, MX100, MX400, MX600 | |
Learn | ||
| Cisco | Cisco | Zyxel |
Overview  | ||
Cisco ASA firewalls deliver enterprise-class firewall functionality with highly scalable and flexible VPN capabilities to meet diverse needs, from small/branch offices to high performance data centers and service providers. Available in a wide range of models, Cisco ASA can be deployed as a physical or virtual appliance. Flexible VPN capabilities include support for remote access, site-to-site, and clientless VPN. Also, select appliances support clustering for increased performance, VPN load balancing to optimize available resources, advanced high availability configurations, and more. Cisco ASAv is the virtualized version of the Cisco ASA firewall. Widely deployed in leading private and public clouds, Cisco ASAv is ideal for remote worker and multi-tenant environments. The solution scales up/down to meet performance requirements and high availability provides resilience. Also, Cisco ASAv can deliver micro-segmentation to protect east-west network traffic. Cisco firewalls provide consistent security policies, enforcement, and protection across all your environments. Unified management for Cisco ASA and FTD/NGFW physical and virtual firewalls is delivered by Cisco Defense Orchestrator (CDO), with cloud logging also available. And with Cisco SecureX included with every Cisco firewall, you gain a cloud-native platform experience that enables greater simplicity, visibility, and efficiency. Learn more about Cisco’s firewall solutions, including virtual appliances for public and private cloud. | With the proliferation of modern applications and mixed-use networks, host and port based security is no longer sufficient. Cisco Meraki's layer 7 "next generation" firewall, included in MX security appliances and every wireless AP, gives administrators complete control over the users, content, and applications on their network. | ZyWALL USG Series delivers high-access quality to help businesses satisfy the demand for always-online communications. For internal deployments, the ZyWALL USG Series provides active-passive High-Availability (HA) service to support device or connection failover. With Device HA Pro service, the ZyWALL USG Series also supports instant failover, so connections are always maintained when a failover event occurs. For external deployments, the ZyWALL USG Series features multi- WAN load balancing/failover and a comprehensive mobile broadband USB modem support list for WAN backup operations. The ZyWALL USG Series also supports IPSec load balancing and failover, providing additional resilience for mission-critical VPN failover with VTI Interface deployments. ZyWALL USG110/210/310 thoroughly protects networks with industry-leading firewall, Anti-Malware/ Virus, Anti-Spam, Content Filtering, IDP, and Application Patrol functionality. Regulate unauthorized use of Web applications over your network, such as Facebook, Google apps, and Netflix, among others. Zyxel security measures are enhanced with SSL Inspection, blocking threats hidden in SSL-encrypted connections while facilitating deeper policy enforcement. Furthermore, newly improved Content Filtering 2.0 enhances HTTPS Domain Filter, Browser SafeSearch, and Geo IP Blocking for an array of security enhancements to ensure clean Web connections. |
Offer | ||
Learn more about Cisco ASA Firewall | Learn more about Meraki MX | Learn more about Zyxel Unified Security Gateway |
Sample Customers | ||
| There are more than one million Adaptive Security Appliances deployed globally. Top customers include First American Financial Corp., Genzyme, Frankfurt Airport, Hansgrohe SE, Rio Olympics, The French Laundry, Rackspace, and City of Tomorrow. | Hyatt, ONS | Information Not Available |
Top Industries | ||
Financial Services Firm17% Comms Service Provider14% Manufacturing Company10% Computer Software Company7% Comms Service Provider34% Computer Software Company22% Media Company5% Government4% | Comms Service Provider33% Financial Services Firm13% Pharma/Biotech Company13% Non Tech Company7% Comms Service Provider27% Computer Software Company21% Construction Company6% Retailer4% | Comms Service Provider46% Computer Software Company17% Manufacturing Company5% Non Profit4% |
Company Size | ||
Small Business35% Midsize Enterprise25% Large Enterprise39% Small Business28% Midsize Enterprise21% Large Enterprise51% | Small Business53% Midsize Enterprise25% Large Enterprise22% Small Business37% Midsize Enterprise30% Large Enterprise33% | No Data Available |
Find out what your peers are saying about Sophos, WatchGuard, Cisco and others in Unified Threat Management (UTM). Updated: January 2021.
456,719 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Meraki MX is ranked 3rd in Unified Threat Management (UTM) with 23 reviews while Zyxel Unified Security Gateway is ranked 9th in Unified Threat Management (UTM) with 1 review. Meraki MX is rated 8.2, while Zyxel Unified Security Gateway is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Meraki MX writes "Great SD-WAN solution. Manage multiple Meraki devices (security, switches, APs, Cameras) with a single pane of glass". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zyxel Unified Security Gateway writes "A robust appliance that is reasonably priced and straightforward to set up". Meraki MX is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, Cisco Firepower NGFW Firewall, SonicWall NSA, Sophos XG and SonicWall TZ, whereas Zyxel Unified Security Gateway is most compared with pfSense, Fortinet FortiOS, WatchGuard Firebox, Sophos UTM and Untangle NG Firewall.
See our list of best Unified Threat Management (UTM) vendors and best Firewalls vendors.
We monitor all Unified Threat Management (UTM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.