Compare Meraki SD-WAN vs. Midokura

You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Meraki SD-WAN Logo
7,751 views|6,162 comparisons
Midokura Logo
46 views|27 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Meraki solutions come with a choice of several different subscription options including one year, three years, five years, seven years, and ten years.""The licensing fees are approximately $1,000 USD annually.""The pricing is fair, but if they can make it less it would be even more attractive.""Any license you buy until January 2021 gets you an extra year for that purchase.""like everything else, it's negotiable.""If you purchase a Meeraki box, you have to purchase a license, and it's already the basic license, you will have you SD-WAN included.""This solution is more expensive than competitors."

More Meraki SD-WAN Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Defined Networking (SDN) solutions are best for your needs.
522,693 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The solution has many features available.
Top Answer: This solution is more expensive than competitors.
Top Answer: The security and upgrading could improve in this solution. In an upcoming release, they could add more security features, such as antivirus.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Average Words per Review
Average Words per Review
Popular Comparisons
Learn More
Video Not Available

Software-defined WAN is a new approach to network connectivity that lowers operational costs and improves resource usage for multi-site deployments, allowing network administrators to use bandwidth more efficiently and ensure the highest possible level of performance for critical applications without sacrificing security or data privacy. For more information on deploying and configuring SD-WAN on the Meraki MX Security Appliance, see the Meraki SD-WAN Deployment Guide.

Midokura Enterprise MidoNet (MEM) Insights is a powerful data analytics and dynamic visualization solution that complements the network virtualization overlay from Midokura. Conventional tools offer zero visibility into virtualized networks and encapsulated traffic. MEM Insights empowers operators to make decisions based on data like never before. Easily view details about the virtual network, monitor traffic and tenant usage, and address security and compliance use cases. Unify your operations team with a consistent set of data about physical hosts and virtual network objects onto a single pane of glass.
Learn more about Meraki SD-WAN
Learn more about Midokura
Sample Customers
École Jeannine Manuel
Top Industries
Comms Service Provider38%
Educational Organization15%
Financial Services Firm15%
Logistics Company8%
Comms Service Provider37%
Computer Software Company23%
Construction Company4%
No Data Available
Company Size
Small Business48%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise35%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Meraki SD-WAN vs. Midokura and other solutions. Updated: July 2021.
522,693 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Meraki SD-WAN is ranked 1st in Software Defined Networking (SDN) with 21 reviews while Midokura is ranked 19th in Software Defined Networking (SDN). Meraki SD-WAN is rated 8.2, while Midokura is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Meraki SD-WAN writes "Ultimate flexibility in this solution lends opportunities for creative problem solving and cost savings". On the other hand, Meraki SD-WAN is most compared with VMware SD-WAN, Cisco SD-WAN, Versa FlexVNF, Cradlepoint NetCloud and Prisma SD-WAN, whereas Midokura is most compared with .

See our list of best Software Defined Networking (SDN) vendors.

We monitor all Software Defined Networking (SDN) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.