We performed a comparison between Meraki SD-WAN and Nutanix Flow Network Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Big Switch Networks, Juniper and others in Software Defined Networking (SDN)."This product has a simple configuration that can be accessed through a web interface or the API."
"The dashboard is the solution's most valuable feature."
"We have found the product to be quite scalable."
"I like the entire set of features and the analytics."
"The most valuable feature for me is the security functionality."
"Meraki makes you believe that anything is possible."
"This product contributed to a huge benefit in our bottom line on operational costs."
"Zero touch configuration onsite based on the manager system's pre-configuration and the VPN automation set."
"Nutanix Flow Network Security is a simple solution that is usable, easy to understand, and easy to deploy."
"It is a very stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"We appreciate the fact that this solution allows us to segregate two virtual machines that are in the same cluster."
"Nutanix Flow is straightforward to install. You only need to select a checkmark that you want to enable Nutanix Flow."
"Nutanix Flow has a lot of data protection features. It's also valuable for operations and management. It's a big solution that works well with different solutions and is suitable for most business cases."
"It allows for policies that enable complete visibility and traffic control."
"Flow Network Security's most valuable features are user-friendliness, the console, and policy creation."
"The network view was excellent as it allowed us to expand the server view and visualize all connections it made within the environment. This was particularly useful in identifying the path of our data and not just its location within the data center."
"You need to have internet access to configure the solution. You cannot do it locally, there should be a local option."
"It should be easier to install BGP and it should have a better backup."
"Meraki SD-WAN could improve by adding wireless access time-scheduled and overall capabilities."
"Overall, we are satisfied with the support, although I cannot state this unequivocally."
"This vendor has issues with the supply chain that need to be improved."
"The only area for improvement in Meraki SD-WAN is its licensing model, as well as its cost structure."
"The blocklist on the Cisco Meraki side isn't complete or very large. We'd like to see them update and expand this."
"Technical support could be more knowledgeable and responsive."
"We would like the reporting functionality of this solution to be improved."
"The most difficult part is the configuration of the initial blueprints."
"I would rate Flow Network Security's stability seven out of ten - it could be improved."
"Nutanix Flow's networking features could use some improvement. Also, I don't know if it's currently supporting load balancing or not."
"While the graphical interface of Nutanix Flow Network Security could have been improved, and some of the reporting features needed extra work, the product's features were similar to VMware's NSX. The difference lay more in the presentation and user interface."
"The documentation offered by the product is an area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."
"The solution’s pricing could be improved."
"For customers who are running Nutanix Flow and AHV, the largest area for improvement is in the disaster recovery environments. To automate the populate of rules from one side to the other side in case of disaster you report everything on the disaster recovery site, and you have all the rules automatically applied. This was something that was being built when I left Nutanix. It might already be available. Additionally, the usability of the rules editor could improve."
More Nutanix Flow Network Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Meraki SD-WAN is ranked 1st in Software Defined Networking (SDN) with 60 reviews while Nutanix Flow Network Security is ranked 4th in Microsegmentation Software with 8 reviews. Meraki SD-WAN is rated 8.2, while Nutanix Flow Network Security is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of Meraki SD-WAN writes "Very stable security, great service, and the best for VPN management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nutanix Flow Network Security writes "Offers great integration capabilities and helps design a disaster recovery plan". Meraki SD-WAN is most compared with Cisco SD-WAN, VMware SD-WAN, Omada Cloud SDN, Cradlepoint NetCloud and Cisco ACI, whereas Nutanix Flow Network Security is most compared with VMware NSX, Illumio, Akamai Guardicore Segmentation, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and Cisco Secure Workload.
We monitor all Software Defined Networking (SDN) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.