Ivanti Neurons for RBVM vs Rapid7 Metasploit comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ivanti Logo
363 views|274 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Rapid7 Logo
2,660 views|1,560 comparisons
94% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Ivanti Neurons for RBVM and Rapid7 Metasploit based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Vulnerability Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Vulnerability Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Most of the features are similar to what other tools have, but the UIs are quite user friendly. A beginner could use it."

More Ivanti Neurons for RBVM Pros →

"The most valuable feature for us is the support for testing Linux-based web server components.""I don't have any other tools like it, and I always use it when I'm doing a pen test. Metasploit is a great solution for penetration testing,""The option to generate phishing emails has proven to be very valuable in understanding the behavior of users.""All of the features are great.""It contains almost all the available exploits and payloads.""Technical support has been helpful and responsive.""It is scalable. It's in line with our needs.""The most valuable features of the solution are the scripts, the modules, and the tools that the Rapid7 Metasploit framework has."

More Rapid7 Metasploit Pros →

Cons
"I would also like to see more integrations, plugins, and user-friendly automation, similar to the multiple integration scripts that Rapid7 has."

More Ivanti Neurons for RBVM Cons →

"The open-source version has reporting limitations. You need to develop these capabilities yourself. Built-in reporting is an excellent feature for penetration testing, but it isn't a must-have. The solution could also cover more vulnerabilities. Metasploit has around 10,000 exploits in its library, but more is always better.""Better automation capabilities would be an improvement.""The solution is not user-friendly and has room for improvement.""Rapid7 Metasploit could be made easier for new users to learn.""It is necessary to add some training materials and a tutorial for beginners.""We'd like them to offer better coverage of malware.""There are numerous outdated exploits in their database that should be updated.""Advanced Infrastructure should be implemented in the next release for better orchestration."

More Rapid7 Metasploit Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "I use the open-source version of this product. Pricing is not relevant."
  • "It is expensive. Our license expired, and our company is not thinking to renew because of our budget."
  • "The great advantage with Rapid7 Metasploit, of course, is that it's free."
  • "There are two versions available, one of which is the Pro version, and the other is the free version."
  • "Rapid7 Metasploit is cheaper than Tenable.io Vulnerability Management."
  • "On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the product's pricing a six. So it's fairly priced."
  • "The pricing structure involves a one-time purchase cost of approximately twenty thousand dollars or euros for all customers."
  • "We pay monthly. The pricing is reasonable."
  • More Rapid7 Metasploit Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Most of the features are similar to what other tools have, but the UIs are quite user friendly. A beginner could use it.
    Top Answer:They could add more widgets, similar to Rapid7 and InsightVM. I would also like to see more integrations, plugins, and user-friendly automation, similar to the multiple integration scripts that Rapid7… more »
    Top Answer:We use RiskSense for vulnerability management, and we have many integrations. The solution is deployed on cloud. We use this solution daily. There are more than 200 people using this solution in my… more »
    Top Answer:I use Rapid7 Metasploit for payload generation and Post-Exploitation.
    Top Answer:Rapid7 Metasploit could be made easier for new users to learn.
    Ranking
    26th
    Views
    363
    Comparisons
    274
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    202
    Rating
    9.0
    11th
    Views
    2,660
    Comparisons
    1,560
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    402
    Rating
    7.9
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    RiskSense
    Metasploit
    Learn More
    Overview
    Evolve your vulnerability management strategy to a risk-based approach. Ivanti Neurons for RBVM enables you to prioritize the vulnerabilities that pose the most risk to better protect against ransomware and other cyber threats.

    Attackers are always developing new exploits and attack methods—Metasploit penetration testing software helps you use their own weapons against them. Utilizing an ever-growing database of exploits, you can safely simulate real-world attacks on your network to train your security team to spot and stop the real thing.

    Sample Customers
    Care First, City of Alburquerque, Electric Company El Paso, State of Arizona, Washington Gas
    City of Corpus Christi, Diebold, Lumenate, Nebraska Public Power District, Prairie North Regional Health, Apptio, Automation Direct, Bob's Stores, Cardinal Innovations Healthcare Solutions, Carnegie Mellon University
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Healthcare Company10%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Insurance Company7%
    REVIEWERS
    Comms Service Provider36%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Integrator9%
    Computer Software Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Government8%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise63%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise26%
    Large Enterprise47%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise57%
    Buyer's Guide
    Vulnerability Management
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Vulnerability Management. Updated: March 2024.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Ivanti Neurons for RBVM is ranked 26th in Vulnerability Management with 1 review while Rapid7 Metasploit is ranked 11th in Vulnerability Management with 18 reviews. Ivanti Neurons for RBVM is rated 9.0, while Rapid7 Metasploit is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Ivanti Neurons for RBVM writes "Useful for vulnerability management with many integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Rapid7 Metasploit writes "Helps find vulnerabilities in a system to determine whether the system needs to be upgraded". Ivanti Neurons for RBVM is most compared with Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM), Qualys VMDR, Tenable Security Center, Rapid7 InsightVM and Tenable Nessus, whereas Rapid7 Metasploit is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Pentera, Acunetix, Rapid7 InsightVM and Nucleus.

    See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.

    We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.