Compare Micro Focus ALM Quality Center vs. Panaya Test Dynamix
 |
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice | |
"Quality Center is pricey, but cheaper is not always less expensive." "Compared to the market, the price is high." "Pricing is managed by our headquarters. I am able to get from them for very cheap. The market price is horribly expensive." "It all comes down to how many people are going to access the tool. When teams go above 20, I think ALM is a better tool to use from a collaboration and streamlining perspective." "Depending on the volume, the annual maintenance costs vary on a percentage but it's around $300 a year per license for maintenance. It's at 18% of the total cost of the license." "The solution has the ability to handle a large number of projects and users in an enterprise environment with the correct license." "Most vendors offer the same pricing, though some vendors offer a cheaper price for their cloud/SaaS solution versus their on-premise. However, cloud/SaaS solutions result in a loss of freedom. E.g., if you want to make a change, most of the time it needs to be validated by the vendor, then you're being charged an addition fee. Sometimes, even if you are rejected, you are charged because it's a risk to the entire environment." "I don't know the exact numbers, but I know it is pricey. When we talked to the sales reps we work with from our company, they say, "Well, Micro Focus will never lose on price." So, they are willing to do a lot of negotiating if it is required." More Micro Focus ALM Quality Center Pricing and Cost Advice » | "The solution is rather expensive due to the security it has to offer." |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs. 456,495 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Questions from the Community | |
Top Answer: We can get an entire project into a single repository where we can view all the data in detail. This is where we keep all our test cases where everyone can reference them. This provides everyone… more » Top Answer: Compared to the market, the price is high. We just renewed our licenses, which took time to do. I think we have 30 concurrent licenses. The world is changing to open source code and free applications… more » Top Answer: It takes time because it has a 360 view of all the processes when talking about test case, design, and defects. There are so many things to track. Therefore, if I try to inject Micro Focus ALM into a… more » | Ask a question Earn 20 points |
Ranking  | |
Views 21,998 Comparisons 13,272 Reviews 26 Average Words per Review 948 Rating 8.0 | Views 1,059 Comparisons 459 Reviews 1 Average Words per Review 633 Rating 8.0 |
Popular Comparisons | |
 Compared 27% of the time.  Compared 18% of the time.  Compared 12% of the time. Compared 6% of the time.  Compared 4% of the time. | Compared 35% of the time.  Compared 32% of the time.  Compared 11% of the time.  Compared 8% of the time. |
Also Known As | |
| HPE ALM, Quality Center, Quality Center, Micro Focus ALM | Panaya Test Center |
Learn | |
| Micro Focus | Panaya |
Overview | |
Micro Focus Application Lifecycle Management software (ALM), is a unified platform that helps teams prioritize, align and focus their project activities, provides actionable insight, and fosters the re-use of assets from requirements through development, testing, and readiness for delivery. Built on best practices, an extensible architecture and centralized repository, Micro Focus ALM is one of the first unified, technology-agnostic application management systems available now; integrating out-of-the-box with over 30 open source and competitive industry products. Micro Focus’s ALM suite provides flexible solutions and deployment options to meet your needs and scale with you as you grow. | With Panaya Test Dynamix, accelerate and standardize packaged application testing without compromising on scope or quality. By encompassing the needs of all stakeholders and integrating standardized testing processes for both technical IT and Business users, Panaya reduces overall testing efforts by 30-50%. |
Offer | |
Learn more about Micro Focus ALM Quality Center | Learn more about Panaya Test Dynamix |
Sample Customers | |
| Specsavers, Cardinal Health, KMD, Turkcell | Allianz Global Investors, AGC (Asahi Glass Company), OTTO Office, Etablissement Français du Sang, Eissmann Group Automotive, Aritzia, ABB Brazil |
Top Industries | |
Financial Services Firm19% Comms Service Provider13% Healthcare Company10% Insurance Company10% Computer Software Company39% Comms Service Provider13% Financial Services Firm7% Government6% | Computer Software Company38% Comms Service Provider12% Media Company11% Energy/Utilities Company5% |
Company Size | |
Small Business14% Midsize Enterprise13% Large Enterprise74% Small Business5% Midsize Enterprise13% Large Enterprise82% | No Data Available |
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Microsoft, Tricentis and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: January 2021.
456,495 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Micro Focus ALM Quality Center is ranked 1st in Test Management Tools with 24 reviews while Panaya Test Dynamix is ranked 13th in Test Management Tools with 1 review. Micro Focus ALM Quality Center is rated 7.8, while Panaya Test Dynamix is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Micro Focus ALM Quality Center writes "Makes it easy to go back and execute the same test every time with automation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Panaya Test Dynamix writes "I get a consolidated view and reporting and it enables us to build a workflow that we can customize to our requirements". Micro Focus ALM Quality Center is most compared with Micro Focus ALM Octane, Jira, Microsoft Azure DevOps, TFS and Tricentis qTest, whereas Panaya Test Dynamix is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Worksoft Certify, Selenium HQ and Oracle Application Testing Suite.
See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.