Compare Panaya Test Dynamix vs. Worksoft Certify

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, Micro Focus and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: January 2021.
455,301 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The solution is rather expensive due to the security it has to offer."

More Panaya Test Dynamix Pricing and Cost Advice »

"We would purchase more licenses right now if they were cheaper. Pricing is a little bit of a hindrance.""It is expensive compared to some of the other automation tools in the market. However, the benefits and ROI has proved that it has been a good investment.""The initial upfront cost in terms of licenses, plus all the money that we spent developing tests, has proven it's worth. Now, we can do a regression test suite in ten days as opposed to sixteen weeks.""Our ROI is primarily a reduction in testing time. The testing, when we were doing it manually, was 30 to 40 percent of the project's cost.""We ended up buying too many licenses. They were very good at selling it to us, and probably oversold it a little. We bought 45 licenses and have never used more than twenty. However, they gave us a pretty significant discount on the bigger license, so it made sense for us to buy enough that we wouldn't have to go back and ask for more.""We could use Certify to do robotic process automation, which is basically running a process on your correction system instead of your test system. Therefore, we may do that in the future.""By using automation, it reduced about 75 percent of the time when compared to any other tool.""Saving money and better quality, these are the benefits of Certify."

More Worksoft Certify Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
455,301 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: It does allow for good reusability. When it's designed properly and utilized properly, we can put things in a way that allows for reusability, meaning a lot of reuse of VA01, if they're very similar… more »
Top Answer: Looking at it as a product fully packaged, I would like to see more documentation or ease of use of the documentation. Sometimes documentation does exist but we have to search three different sites to… more »
Ranking
22nd
Views
1,059
Comparisons
459
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
633
Rating
8.0
2nd
Views
14,364
Comparisons
4,034
Reviews
36
Average Words per Review
1,367
Rating
8.6
Popular Comparisons
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 31% of the time.
Compared 26% of the time.
Also Known As
Panaya Test Center
Learn
Panaya
Worksoft
Overview

With Panaya Test Dynamix, accelerate and standardize packaged application testing without compromising on scope or quality. By encompassing the needs of all stakeholders and integrating standardized testing processes for both technical IT and Business users, Panaya reduces overall testing efforts by 30-50%.

Worksoft is a leading global provider of automation software for high-velocity business process testing and discovery. Enterprises worldwide use Worksoft intelligent automation to innovate faster, lower technology risk, reduce costs, improve quality, and deeply understand their real end-to-end business processes. Global 5000 companies across all industries choose Worksoft for high speed process discovery and functional testing of digital, web, cloud, mobile, big data, and dozens of enterprise applications, including SAP, Oracle, and Salesforce.com.
Offer
Learn more about Panaya Test Dynamix
Learn more about Worksoft Certify
Sample Customers
Allianz Global Investors, AGC (Asahi Glass Company), OTTO Office, Etablissement Français du Sang, Eissmann Group Automotive, Aritzia, ABB BrazilKraft, Reliant Energy, Richemont, Applied Materials, Siemens PLM, Mosaic, Dow Corning, ebay, IBM, Accenture, Fortis BC, US Government, Southwest Airlines
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company38%
Comms Service Provider12%
Media Company11%
Energy/Utilities Company5%
REVIEWERS
Manufacturing Company28%
Energy/Utilities Company13%
Consumer Goods Company13%
Logistics Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company37%
Comms Service Provider11%
Manufacturing Company8%
Financial Services Firm6%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business6%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise85%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business9%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise82%
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, Micro Focus and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: January 2021.
455,301 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Panaya Test Dynamix is ranked 22nd in Functional Testing Tools with 1 review while Worksoft Certify is ranked 2nd in Functional Testing Tools with 36 reviews. Panaya Test Dynamix is rated 8.0, while Worksoft Certify is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Panaya Test Dynamix writes "I get a consolidated view and reporting and it enables us to build a workflow that we can customize to our requirements". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Worksoft Certify writes "Enables us to automate end-to-end testing of our integration between S/4HANA and Salesforce.com". Panaya Test Dynamix is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Selenium HQ, Oracle Application Testing Suite, Micro Focus UFT One and Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, whereas Worksoft Certify is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Selenium HQ, Micro Focus UFT One, Eggplant Functional and Micro Focus ALM Quality Center.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.