Compare Panaya Test Dynamix vs. Worksoft Certify

Panaya Test Dynamix is ranked 19th in Functional Testing Tools with 2 reviews while Worksoft Certify is ranked 1st in Functional Testing Tools with 30 reviews. Panaya Test Dynamix is rated 9.0, while Worksoft Certify is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Panaya Test Dynamix writes "I get a consolidated view and reporting and it enables us to build a workflow that we can customize to our requirements". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Worksoft Certify writes "Our automation tests are more robust than our manual tests". Panaya Test Dynamix is most compared with UFT (QTP), Worksoft Certify and Tricentis Tosca, whereas Worksoft Certify is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, UFT (QTP) and Selenium HQ.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Worksoft, Micro Focus, Tricentis and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: September 2019.
366,756 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The initial setup was not complex and the product itself is very easy to configure and use.Test migration from HPE are done automatically. We can extract our tests from HPE, and they convert it into the Panaya format.It is easy for business users to use who are not familiar with testing tools.Provides better monitoring for testing campaigns and business process testing.

Read more »

With autotesting, we have been able to eliminate duplication of test cases across those four areas. This has helped us knock down our number of test cases. Our test cases are also running more optimally. Therefore, it has very much helped in that sense, so we were able to eliminate a lot of test cases and get out of manual silos by running on autotesting, which is more efficient.It is a pretty easy tool to use as far as automated testing tools go.We are now trying to automate all our applications: SAP, web, third-party, and legacy. Instead of multiple tools, we have been able to have Worksoft handle a lot of our applications. This has saved us a lot of time and effort.People who don't have coding knowledge are capable of doing automation with Certify. It reduces coding and scripting dependencies.Our business users are doing regression testing as their day job. This is an add-on to their daily work. With everything so pressured in the industry, automation takes the pressure of these users.It helps us to implement automation testing as part of most projects, so the need for manual testing can be reduced. This really accelerates the testing process as a whole. Before, where it could take ten days to test a project, now it takes only one or two days to do the complete testing.Worksoft has helped us position our company better because the product lets us show our value in terms of the benefits that we bring.Mostly in the area of project testing, the most immediate benefit is when you historically have manual testers do a certain job, and a full regression testing was previously done 100 percent manually. We have had cases where the release testing for an entire region would take around 12 weeks. With Worksoft, we are now down to two to three weeks. So, that is one use case where we have had success.

Read more »

Cons
They provide options for custom fields or tabs, but customization of workflows would be great.Support is reactive and in English only.

Read more »

It would be great if our business testers could develop their own automated test cases. With every release you do, you have to go back and touch your old test cases and bring them up to speed, or develop new test cases. In the beginning, that is a challenge because you have to have someone who is certified in the tool to help you develop these test cases.Technical support's first response to us is usually late.Web UI testing was difficult in the beginning, as we had a homegrown product, and we had to do the proper object naming.One feature that could be added to Capture 2.0 is generating a PDF file from your capture, so you can see your screenshots and steps.The updates for SAP Fiori have been great, where previously we saw a lot of issues. A year ago, it used to fail miserably.There have been some previous security concerns with the way that Capture has worked. When you turn it on, you don't know what it's capturing. This has raised some concerns in the past, especially in our European regions.The stability needs help. This is main thing that needs help, and if it's not the stability, then it's Worksoft's ability to respond to issues.The technical support comes on, and says, "Oh, so-and-so link is here, go through that link, and make the modifications." I'm not comfortable in making those changes. I want to schedule a call, share my screen, and have them fix it for me.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
The solution is rather expensive due to the security it has to offer.

Read more »

There is a cost involved to doing it, but once you get over the initial cost, then you'll start reaping the benefits and seeing that testing is getting done more quickly and efficiently. We are still early on with it, but the expectation and what we're seeing is that we will start seeing some savings coming out on the back-end once we have this done.The price is in line with everyone else's in the market. They are not cheaper nor more expensive than anyone else who was in our RFP.We no longer need ten people sitting and manually testing something. We can just have one person running the entire regression automation testing suite, and this has saved us dollars.The license cost is quite high. This might not be a consideration for a large company, but it will be for a small company. E.g., Tricentis (their competitor) offers certain exclusive use cases where a company can use it in a certain way, so this is another option that companies consider.Automating our manual processes has saved us 70 to 80 percent in time.We saved $1.3 million using Worksoft Certify in 2017.Cost-wise, compared with other tools, it is a great product.This solution has enabled our clients to automate and save time (approximately 40 to 50 percent).

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
366,756 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
19th
Views
551
Comparisons
265
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
264
Avg. Rating
10.0
1st
Views
10,609
Comparisons
3,311
Reviews
30
Average Words per Review
1,253
Avg. Rating
8.5
Top Comparisons
Compared 40% of the time.
Compared 29% of the time.
Compared 22% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Also Known As
Panaya Test Center
Learn
Panaya
Worksoft
Overview

With Panaya Test Dynamix, accelerate and standardize packaged application testing without compromising on scope or quality. By encompassing the needs of all stakeholders and integrating standardized testing processes for both technical IT and Business users, Panaya reduces overall testing efforts by 30-50%.

Worksoft is a leading global provider of automation software for high-velocity business process testing and discovery. Enterprises worldwide use Worksoft intelligent automation to innovate faster, lower technology risk, reduce costs, improve quality, and deeply understand their real end-to-end business processes. Global 5000 companies across all industries choose Worksoft for high speed process discovery and functional testing of digital, web, cloud, mobile, big data, and dozens of enterprise applications, including SAP, Oracle, and Salesforce.com.
Offer
Learn more about Panaya Test Dynamix
Learn more about Worksoft Certify
Sample Customers
Allianz Global Investors, AGC (Asahi Glass Company), OTTO Office, Etablissement Fran├žais du Sang, Eissmann Group Automotive, Aritzia, ABB BrazilKraft, Reliant Energy, Richemont, Applied Materials, Siemens PLM, Mosaic, Dow Corning, ebay, IBM, Accenture, Fortis BC, US Government, Southwest Airlines
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Manufacturing Company26%
Energy/Utilities Company16%
Consumer Goods13%
Pharma/Biotech Company10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company25%
Manufacturing Company15%
Media Company12%
Pharma/Biotech Company9%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business2%
Midsize Enterprise7%
Large Enterprise91%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business5%
Midsize Enterprise1%
Large Enterprise94%
Find out what your peers are saying about Worksoft, Micro Focus, Tricentis and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: September 2019.
366,756 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email