Micro Focus Silk Test vs Wikidi Testomato

Micro Focus Silk Test is ranked 16th in Functional Testing Tools with 4 reviews vs Wikidi Testomato which is ranked 36th in Functional Testing Tools with 0 reviews. The top reviewer of Micro Focus Silk Test writes "OCR recognition and integration with IE are advantages but needs better integration with other tools". Micro Focus Silk Test is most compared with Micro Focus UFT (QTP), SmartBear TestComplete and Micro Focus Quality Center. Wikidi Testomato is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Micro Focus Silk Test and Automation Anywhere.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
Use Wikidi Testomato? Share your opinion.
Functional testing tools report from it central station 2018 02 17 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Tricentis, Sauce Labs and others in Functional Testing Tools.
252,993 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing Micro Focus Silk Test vs Wikidi Testomato

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Functional testing tools report from it central station 2018 02 17 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Tricentis, Sauce Labs and others in Functional Testing Tools.
252,993 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
7,174
Comparisons
3,836
Reviews
4
Followers
863
Avg. Rating
7.8
Views
201
Comparisons
139
Reviews
0
Followers
517
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Top ComparisonsSee more Micro Focus Silk Test competitors »
Tricentislogo
Compared 4% of the time.
See more Wikidi Testomato competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AsSegue, SilkTest, Silk Test, Silk PerformerTestomato
Website/Video
Website/VideoMicro Focus
  • Vendor 7619 screenshot 1516468546
Wikidi
  • Vendor 29212 screenshot 1514069816
OverviewQuestionmark icon
OverviewSilkTest is robust and portable test automation for web, native, and enterprise software applications. Silk Test's portability enables users to test applications more effectively with lower complexity and cost in comparison to other functional testing tools on the market. Silk Test's role based testing enables business stakeholders, QA engineers, and developers to contribute to the whole automation testing process, which drives collaboration and increases the effectiveness of software testing.
Information Not Available
Sample Customers
Sample CustomersKrung Thai Computer Services, Quality Kiosk, Mªller, AVG TechnologiesJollibee, Wingmen Online Marketing GmbH, Kaymu, Dixi, Toi Toi
Top IndustriesQuestionmark icon
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Insurance Company
24%
Healthcare Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
13%
Software R&D Company
11%
No Data Available
Functional testing tools report from it central station 2018 02 17 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Tricentis, Sauce Labs and others in Functional Testing Tools.
Download now
252,993 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email