Compare Micro Focus UFT Developer vs. Micro Focus UFT One

Micro Focus UFT Developer is ranked 12th in Functional Testing Tools with 7 reviews while Micro Focus UFT One is ranked 4th in Functional Testing Tools with 4 reviews. Micro Focus UFT Developer is rated 6.8, while Micro Focus UFT One is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Micro Focus UFT Developer writes "Helps to determine problem areas but it has many problems and limitations ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Micro Focus UFT One writes "With regularly occurring application releases, any QA team member can execute tests (regression suites) stored in ALM/Quality Center, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results". Micro Focus UFT Developer is most compared with Micro Focus UFT One, Selenium HQ and Tricentis Tosca, whereas Micro Focus UFT One is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, SmartBear TestComplete and Micro Focus UFT Developer. See our Micro Focus UFT Developer vs. Micro Focus UFT One report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus UFT Developer vs. Micro Focus UFT One and other solutions. Updated: January 2020.
397,408 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The most valuable feature is the Object Model, where you can directly pull up the object as a global or a local.The most valuable feature is the automation of test cases.The recording feature is quite good as it helps us to find out how things are working.The most valuable feature of the solution is the number of plugins for object recognition. The predefined libraries allow us to automate tasks.The most valuable feature for me is the number of protocols that can be tested. It not only tests Web, but also SAP, Siebel, .Net, and even pdf.One of the important features, which speeds up the automation testing development with LeanFT, is its object repository functions. Object identification are the most time-consuming aspect of building automation tests. LeanFT gives that out of the box. It helps you identify the objects and after that, once you got the object in place, then it's just about building the test scripts. So it reduces your development time significantly.It is a product that can meet regulations of the banking industry.

Read more »

UFT has improved our ability to regression test.

Read more »

Cons
It would be improved by adding a drag-and-drop interface to help alleviate the coding.The support from Micro Focus needs a lot of improvement.The product has shown no development over the past 10 or 15 years.UFT is like a flagship of testing tools, but it's too expensive and people are not using it so much. They should work on their pricing to make themselves more competitive.It's now too heavy and they should be making it faster. We do an attempt at automatic regression testing. We schedule a test to start at a certain time. It takes a lot of time to download the resources and start UFT. Competitors in this area have tools that start faster and run the test faster. For example, if the test at our side will take 10 minutes, another tool will do that in one minute.The parallel execution of the tests needs improvement. When we are running tests in LeanFT, there are some limitations in terms of running the same tests simultaneously across different browsers. If I'm running a test, let's say to log in, I should be able to execute it through IE, through Microsoft Edge, through Chrome, through Mozilla, etc. This capability doesn't exist in LeanFT. Parallel execution of the test cases across different browsers need to be added.It is unstable, expensive, inflexible, and has poor support.

Read more »

It could work with more browsers other than Internet Explorer, and could better handle new things like Ext JS.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
The cost of this solution is a little bit high and we are considering moving to another solution.The pricing is quite high compared to the competition.It is quite expensive and is priced per seat or in concurrent (or floating) licenses over a period of months.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
397,408 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
12th
Views
5,705
Comparisons
3,656
Reviews
7
Average Words per Review
887
Avg. Rating
6.7
4th
Views
25,414
Comparisons
15,957
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
973
Avg. Rating
8.5
Top Comparisons
Also Known As
UFT Pro (LeanFT), Micro Focus UFT Pro (LeanFT), LeanFT, HPE LeanFTUFT (QTP), Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro, QuickTest Professional, HPE UFT (QTP)
Learn
Micro Focus
Micro Focus
Overview

Micro Focus UFT Pro (LeanFT) is a powerful yet lightweight functional test automation solution, that supports a wide range of AUT technologies. Targeted to technical test automation engineers and developers/testers in Agile teams, Micro Focus UFT Pro (LeanFT) is fully embedded in standard IDEs and integrates naturally with the Dev and QA ecosystems.

QuickTest Professional is now known as Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing, and is an automated testing tool that provides unified AI, GUI, and Business Process testing.

With QuickTest Professional, you can free up IT resources to focus on other areas, while the automated software takes care of all your application software testing requirements. Testing happens continuously and quickly, and so nips any potential issues in the bud. QuickTest Professional saves money and time, and optimizes business productivity and overall user experience.

Offer
Learn more about Micro Focus UFT Developer
Learn more about Micro Focus UFT One
Sample Customers
Walmart, Hitachi, American Airlines, PepsiCo, AT&T, Ericsson, United Airlines CSS Insurance, Revolution IT, Credit Suisse, and General Electric Company.
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm20%
Healthcare Company13%
Software R&D Company13%
Comms Service Provider13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company36%
Comms Service Provider23%
Financial Services Firm7%
Individual & Family Service7%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm36%
Insurance Company14%
Healthcare Company14%
Retailer14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company38%
Comms Service Provider11%
Financial Services Firm9%
Manufacturing Company8%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business4%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise79%
REVIEWERS
Small Business16%
Midsize Enterprise16%
Large Enterprise67%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business9%
Midsize Enterprise2%
Large Enterprise89%
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus UFT Developer vs. Micro Focus UFT One and other solutions. Updated: January 2020.
397,408 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.