Leading SAP Testing Program at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Real User
2021-05-22T09:09:55Z
May 22, 2021
Its cost is a bit high. From the licensing perspective, I am using a concurrent license. It is not a seed license. It is something that I can use in our network. It can also be used by other users.
Systems Engineer at a aerospace/defense firm with 10,001+ employees
Real User
2021-03-30T06:44:37Z
Mar 30, 2021
The pricing of the solution is high. It's more than $10,000 per floating license. That's a yearly cost. There are no additional costs on top of that, however.
Team Leader at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
2020-10-25T15:30:11Z
Oct 25, 2020
Pricing is the biggest feature. When we compare in the market with other tools that have similar features, it may be a little bit extra, but the cost is ten times less.
Senior Test Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Real User
2019-11-13T05:28:00Z
Nov 13, 2019
As far as comparing to other products, the licensing costs for UFT are very high. I don't remember the cost exactly. The maintenance of the service contract was very high as well and, frankly — compared with more modern tools — it was and is not worth it. A good thing is that there are not any costs in addition to standard licensing fees, but the standard licensing fees are going to be high in comparison to other products so you don't gain anything.
IT Architect and Test Tool Designer at a comms service provider with 5,001-10,000 employees
Real User
2019-10-16T06:52:00Z
Oct 16, 2019
Pricing depends on which model you choose. The cloud version has a monthly fee, whereas on-prem versions offer yearly or monthly fees. You can also purchase a permanent license. If your license expires, you will still be able to use the solution, but without support.
Research & Development Engineer at a insurance company with 201-500 employees
Real User
2019-08-19T05:47:00Z
Aug 19, 2019
I think the cost of UFT is too high and obviously expensive, especially if you consider that there are other even better products, in my opinion, that are open-source. Because of the expense, we use UFT only with big companies. For a small company with a smaller budget, we can't choose UFT because UFT is very expensive.
The pricing is competitive. It is affordable and average.
Pricing is expensive. If I would rate it with one being inexpensive and ten being expensive, I would rate pricing an eight out of ten.
The licensing cost is high. There are no additional costs to the standard license. It's a yearly subscription.
The price of the solution could be lowered. The cost is approximately $25 per year for a subscription-based license.
The pricing and licensing can be a bit of a challenge.
Its cost is a bit high. From the licensing perspective, I am using a concurrent license. It is not a seed license. It is something that I can use in our network. It can also be used by other users.
The licensing is very expensive, so often, we don't have enough VMs to run all of our tests.
The pricing of the solution is high. It's more than $10,000 per floating license. That's a yearly cost. There are no additional costs on top of that, however.
It is cheap, but if you take the enterprise license, it is valid for both software items.
I am not aware of the pricing.
Pricing is the biggest feature. When we compare in the market with other tools that have similar features, it may be a little bit extra, but the cost is ten times less.
The cost of this solution is a little bit high and we are considering moving to another one.
As far as comparing to other products, the licensing costs for UFT are very high. I don't remember the cost exactly. The maintenance of the service contract was very high as well and, frankly — compared with more modern tools — it was and is not worth it. A good thing is that there are not any costs in addition to standard licensing fees, but the standard licensing fees are going to be high in comparison to other products so you don't gain anything.
Pricing depends on which model you choose. The cloud version has a monthly fee, whereas on-prem versions offer yearly or monthly fees. You can also purchase a permanent license. If your license expires, you will still be able to use the solution, but without support.
I think the cost of UFT is too high and obviously expensive, especially if you consider that there are other even better products, in my opinion, that are open-source. Because of the expense, we use UFT only with big companies. For a small company with a smaller budget, we can't choose UFT because UFT is very expensive.