We performed a comparison between OpenText SiteScope and POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.Earn 20 points
OpenText SiteScope is ranked 28th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 24 reviews while POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring is ranked 70th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. OpenText SiteScope is rated 7.6, while POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of OpenText SiteScope writes "Doesn't require much custom coding and can run on different platforms, but the types of scripting files you can execute on it are limited". On the other hand, the top reviewer of POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring writes "Gives us clear information on what is going wrong and where we need to focus to improve our applications, but it lacks automatic alerting". OpenText SiteScope is most compared with SCOM, Dynatrace, AppDynamics, Prometheus and Splunk Enterprise Security, whereas POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring is most compared with . See our OpenText SiteScope vs. POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.