Compare Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope vs. VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope vs. VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront and other solutions. Updated: November 2020.
448,896 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The Monitor Templates functionality allowed us to spin up monitoring with .csv files pretty easily.""There's no agent you need installed on the servers. In our environment, we have some servers out of our control so we cannot manage them. We use SiteScope to monitor the availability, the resources on the servers, etc. This allows us to do this job without installing agents so there's no need to take care of anything on the server.""The product's ability to monitor systems and applications and send alerts and create support tickets are the most valuable features of the product.""For the system environment, SiteScope can be useful."

More Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope Pros »

"This solution allows me to have true visibility for any metrics when it comes to my cloud, and private.""This solution makes it a lot easier to figure out trends within very different data sources, which makes it easy to see why something is misbehaving.""The features I find most valuable is the querying and alerting capabilities.""People are very pleased with the implementation.""The most valuable aspects of the solution are its ease of use and its ease of implementation.""No issues with stability."

More VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront Pros »

Cons
"They have not kept up with browser security requirements or advances in GUIs, they switched to a corruptible database architecture instead of text config files.""Sometimes in a huge environment, I think the documentation does not provide the required calculations so you can't know what the required set up should be. You need to test.""It may lack some features other products in the category have like more detailed transaction tracking.""SiteScope isn't productive if you want to monitor RAM or if you want to monitor some URL."

More Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope Cons »

"I would like to see integration with Kubernetes cluster and APIs so that you can manage the entire stack.""I would like to see more out-of-the-box dashboards for in-depth application monitoring of standard products that are out there.""In the new version, I would love to see more prediction capabilities. It would be great if one could see the alerts get a little more enriched with information and become more human-friendly instead of the technical stuff that they put in there. I think those would be really awesome outcomes to get.""The implementation is a long process that should be improved.""They could make it more easy to plug-in data so that a nontechnical person will be able to use it, like accountants or finance people. That way they don't have to ask us.""It could use a URL document server. Everything in the market is moving towards automation and everybody's looking for the single click operations as well relational data locality."

More VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"You have to pay for their "solution templates". Other tools do not charge you for knowledge-based monitoring bundles."

More Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope Pricing and Cost Advice »

"Educational pricing is available for this solution.""We were given a year's worth of service. It was included within our ELA. We were trying to do a proof of concept, which is almost over now.""Different locations require different setups. In your terms, around 300 to around 400K USD."

More VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Management (APM) solutions are best for your needs.
448,896 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: For the system environment, SiteScope can be useful.
Top Answer: The tool dashboards are not good and don't meet our customers' needs. Because of this we generally use open source tools like Grafana and we also use Nagios for monitoring as a free tool. We're able… more »
Top Answer: Our company manages four different city hospital environments and all of them have SiteScope but each uses a different version depending on how long ago the product was implemented. We're a government… more »
Top Answer: It’s in INR. Our data is on four sites and these are in the development phase. Different locations require different setups. In your terms, around 300 to around 400K USD. Additionally, Nutanix is… more »
Top Answer: It could use a URL document server. Everything in the market is moving towards automation and everybody's looking for the single click operations as well relational data locality. The virtualization… more »
Ranking
Views
3,453
Comparisons
2,195
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
567
Avg. Rating
6.8
Views
6,076
Comparisons
4,221
Reviews
6
Average Words per Review
534
Avg. Rating
7.3
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Micro Focus SiteScope, HPE SiteScope, SiteScopeWavefront, Wavefront by VMware, VMware Tanzu Observability
Learn
Micro Focus
VMware
Overview
SiteScope is an agentless application monitoring software that provides heterogeneous and hybrid support, quick time to value, and ease of installation, configuration, and use.

VMware Tanzu Observability provides metrics-driven analytics at massive scale, so you can get the most out of your cloud-native apps.

Offer
Learn more about Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope
Learn more about VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront
Sample Customers
Vodafone Ireland, Kuveyt Turk Participation BankBox, Intuit, Workday, Groupon, British Gas, SpaceApe, Marketo, DoordDash, Lyft
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Comms Service Provider29%
Financial Services Firm29%
Recruiting/Hr Firm14%
Transportation Company14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company47%
Comms Service Provider12%
Government7%
Financial Services Firm5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company29%
Comms Service Provider21%
Financial Services Firm12%
Retailer5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business29%
Midsize Enterprise12%
Large Enterprise59%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope vs. VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront and other solutions. Updated: November 2020.
448,896 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope is ranked 26th in Application Performance Management (APM) with 4 reviews while VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront is ranked 13th in Application Performance Management (APM) with 6 reviews. Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope is rated 6.8, while VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope writes "System resource monitoring that generates automated alerts and support tickets". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront writes "Simplifies troubleshooting by identifying trends from different data sources". Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope is most compared with Dynatrace, Splunk, AppDynamics, Azure Monitor and SCOM, whereas VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront is most compared with Dynatrace, AppDynamics, Datadog, Splunk and New Relic APM. See our Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope vs. VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront report.

See our list of best Application Performance Management (APM) vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Management (APM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.