Most Helpful Review
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"One of the most valuable features is the ability to report on questionable activity."
"The solution works well when used with other Microsoft solutions."
"The stability of the solution is very good."
"The feature dashboard is very well organized and intuitive to use. It organizes information on a timeline which is exactly what we need for insider threat future-analysis."
"Some of the newer features are not completely there yet... For example, there's a tool that allows you to grade your overall internal security and I don't feel that it's completely accurate."
"It would be ideal if the interface allowed for more granular configurations. For example, if I were to set a rule that is a deviation from the pre-defined rules in the Microsoft product, there's conflict."
"There are occasions where it generates some false positives and you have to embark into figuring it out. You need to find out if it was a true alert or a false positive. It's a little bit cumbersome in that area."
"There is room for improvement in the algorithms. Although I said that we have a very solid starting point - our existing library is already very comprehensive - we constantly find areas where we need to develop new algorithms. That is common across platforms. Any vendor with a solid starting point would still need to continue to evolve."
Pricing and Cost Advice
"I believe we are looking into new licenses. They may be called the E5. Honestly, I don't have it on top of my mind, but I think it's around seven to $10 a user per month."
Information Not Available
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The solution works well when used with other Microsoft solutions.
Top Answer: The software is not as advanced as many competitors. It doesn't offer the level of granularity that other software might. It would be ideal if the interface allowed for more granular configurations… more »
Top Answer: It mostly depends on your use-cases and environment. Exabeam and Securonix have a stronger UEBA feature set, friendlier GUI and are not licensed based on capacity (amount of logs and information… more »
In User Behavior Analytics - UEBA
out of 38 in User Behavior Analytics - UEBA
Average Words per Review
Compared 27% of the time.
Compared 22% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 32% of the time.
Compared 27% of the time.
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Also Known As
|Microsoft Advanced Threat Analytics||Securonix User and Entity Behavior Analytics|
|Microsoft Advanced Threat Analytics (ATA) provides a simple and fast way to understand what is happening within your network by identifying suspicious user and device activity with built-in intelligence and providing clear and relevant threat information on a simple attack timeline. Microsoft ATA is an on-premises platform to help you protect your enterprise from advanced targeted attacks by automatically analyzing, learning, and identifying normal and abnormal entity (user, devices, and resources) behavior. It detects suspicious activities and malicious attacks with behavioral analytics, adapts to the changing nature of cyber-security threats, focuses on what is important with a simple attack timeline and reduces false positive fatigue.|
Securonix User and Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) leverages sophisticated machine learning and behavior analytics to analyze and correlate interactions between users, systems, applications, IP addresses, and data. Light, nimble, and quick to deploy, Securonix UEBA detects advanced insider threats, cyber threats, fraud, cloud data compromise, and non-compliance. Built-in automated response playbooks and customizable case management work flows allow your security team to respond to threats quickly, accurately, and efficiently
Learn more about Microsoft ATA [EOL]
Learn more about Securonix UEBA
|Turkish Airlines, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Empa, The Alberta Teachers' Association||Pfizer, McKesson, BNY Mellon, New York Life|
Computer Software Company27%
Comms Service Provider17%
Computer Software Company38%
Comms Service Provider14%
Microsoft ATA [EOL] is ranked unranked in User Behavior Analytics - UEBA with 3 reviews while Securonix UEBA is ranked 9th in User Behavior Analytics - UEBA with 1 review. Microsoft ATA [EOL] is rated 6.6, while Securonix UEBA is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft ATA [EOL] writes "Good integration, simple to maintain, and very stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Securonix UEBA writes "Algorithms surface the exact indicators we need for insider threat detection". Microsoft ATA [EOL] is most compared with Splunk User Behavior Analytics, Varonis Datalert, Rapid7 InsightIDR, Exabeam and IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics, whereas Securonix UEBA is most compared with ArcSight Interset / Intelligence, IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics, ArcSight Analytics, Rapid7 InsightIDR and Exabeam.
See our list of best User Behavior Analytics - UEBA vendors.
We monitor all User Behavior Analytics - UEBA reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.