We performed a comparison between Microsoft Configuration Manager and Oracle Enterprise Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Server Monitoring solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Patching is the main feature because SCCM is made to control the entire environment without manually interpreting. So it is good to use for patching."
"The most valuable feature is the graphical-based reports of software updates that have been successful, the ones that have failed, and a summary of where the failures are what security breaches may occur."
"Microsoft Configuration Manager helps with patch management."
"I like Mircosoft's technical support. Microsoft has a few updates, like some of the critical KBs. They are published within the interval time, and in case of an escalation on the client missions, we will raise a ticket with the Microsoft team. They will create a hotfix or a critical update. They will chat with us, and that is one thing I like about Microsoft. Whenever any issues occur at my organization, they will help you out soon as possible within the SLA."
"Microsoft has done a good job with authentication solutions, such as single sign-on, or open authentication."
"It's a stable product."
"Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager is very scalable."
"I like a lot of the reporting capabilities and baseline configurations."
"The most valuable feature is the monitoring because it's very useful for checking and troubleshooting compared with other products, like Nagios for example, that have some interaction with Oracle."
"The most valuable feature is high availability."
"It's a useful feature to be able to see the top SQL, the number of executions, the CPU, and the resources that it's using."
"We use Oracle Enterprise Manager for a lot of services like ERP and PLM."
"We use it extensively for performance tuning testing, monitoring, and configuration."
"We can manage everything in our environment."
"There are a number of different user interfaces you can choose from."
"It can also help with capacity planning, sizing, and maximizing overall performance in a large scale environment."
"The solution could improve the functionality for automating, license management. Additionally, more and better-looking reports are needed."
"Its client interface should be more accessible, and the notifications should be more customizable from the console. It should be more user friendly and have some kind of customized notifications so that we can use it on the client side. These are the reasons why we restricted its use only for the server environment and didn't use it on the client side."
"There is no asset management package included."
"One area of improvement is regarding the patching of Office 365 products. We have some difficulties on this side, and it can be improved."
"It should provide the ability to remotely connect to mobile devices. There are some solutions that are doing that, but with Microsoft Intune, the only way to remotely connect to devices outside the organization and mobile devices is by using TeamViewer. It is pretty strange for a big company like Microsoft to not have something for that."
"Our company would prefer not rebooting computers while people are using them. There seems to be no strategy behind it."
"This solution needs to be supported on all Operating systems."
"I would like to see more automation."
"My opinion is that this solution needs to improve consolidation. That is what our business needs the most right now."
"I would like to improve the cost."
"I rate Oracle Enterprise Manager six out of 10 for affordability. It's expensive."
"Oracle Enterprise Manager could improve the monitoring types and the graphics."
"It is complicated to run it on Google Chrome."
"There are limited numbers of other OEM devices that can be integrated into enterprise management that can be scaled by Oracle by adding other OEM devices to enterprise management."
"We could use it but definitely with some effort we can streamline much better and sometimes some box here and there, like 13C you have to really wait, but there are great features. Just have to make sure it is a stable product."
"Better mobile access would be useful."
More Microsoft Configuration Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Configuration Manager is ranked 2nd in Server Monitoring with 78 reviews while Oracle Enterprise Manager is ranked 4th in Server Monitoring with 123 reviews. Microsoft Configuration Manager is rated 8.2, while Oracle Enterprise Manager is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Microsoft Configuration Manager writes "Seamless system updates, useful integration, and reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Enterprise Manager writes "Provides good stability and has an easy implementation process". Microsoft Configuration Manager is most compared with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, Microsoft Intune, BigFix and Tanium, whereas Oracle Enterprise Manager is most compared with Zabbix, Quest Spotlight, Dynatrace, AppDynamics and New Relic. See our Microsoft Configuration Manager vs. Oracle Enterprise Manager report.
See our list of best Server Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all Server Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
