We performed a comparison between Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Rapid7 InsightVM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Risk-Based Vulnerability Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is up-to-date and helps prevent zero-day attacks."
"The product's stability is very high...The scalability of the product is amazing."
"The product’s most valuable features are compliance, recommendations, and inventories."
"The solution helps identify threats and vulnerabilities."
"One valuable feature is the Microsoft Security Scorecard."
"The discovery and prioritization of vulnerabilities."
"Using Rapid7, we can install a scan engine, we can do our VPN connections, and we can conduct internal scans of remote sites. We prefer the web application. It's smarter and more accurate from an application perspective."
"The product's initial setup phase was very easy."
"The most valuable features of Rapid7 InsightVM are the accurate level of scanning and the workflows are good."
"The assessment is most valuable."
"NeXpose is a pretty good vulnerability scanner... There's a nice dashboard."
"It's very scalable."
"It's a relevant management tool."
"The technical support takes too much time to resolve tickets."
"It is challenging to extract and customize reports from the system."
"Integration can be improved."
"The general support could be improved."
"The setup phase of the product is not that easy and needs a person to have a certain level of expertise."
"The InsightVM cannot scan if we connect to our customer by the VPN."
"This solution integrates with another module in Metasploit, that doesn't exist in the other solutions. It is subscribed to on our roadmap, but we chose to implement both Nexppose and AppSpider."
"We have some issues with how it scans patches."
"Patch management is the only missing feature I can think of. Rapid7 detects vulnerabilities, but it should also help you manage patches."
"I would like to see more integration."
"We are a registered reseller and a trusted partner. However, for us to get any support from them I can't log a call directly with Rapid7 InsightVM. I have to work with the distributor to log the call for me."
"One area I would like to improve in InsightVM is its integration with other solutions."
"All products have room for increased security and Rapid7 InsightVM is no exception."
More Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is ranked 7th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 5 reviews while Rapid7 InsightVM is ranked 4th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 55 reviews. Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is rated 8.2, while Rapid7 InsightVM is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management writes "The vulnerability assessment is very accurate because it runs directly into the vulnerability database". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Rapid7 InsightVM writes "You can scan a network, and receive recommendations to address vulnerabilities with the click of a button". Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is most compared with Qualys VMDR, Tenable Nessus, Tenable Vulnerability Management, Microsoft Defender XDR and Microsoft Sentinel, whereas Rapid7 InsightVM is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Security Center, Rapid7 InsightIDR and Wiz. See our Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs. Rapid7 InsightVM report.
See our list of best Risk-Based Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.