Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct vs StorPool comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Microsoft Logo
2,046 views|1,393 comparisons
83% willing to recommend
StorPool Logo
537 views|294 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct and StorPool based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about StarWind, Nutanix, Red Hat and others in Software Defined Storage (SDS).
To learn more, read our detailed Software Defined Storage (SDS) Report (Updated: April 2024).
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The flash ability, in terms of tiering and caching, is amazing""Its technical support is excellent.""It's mainly about the storage expansion, like in hyper-converged solutions.""The most valuable feature is that there is no single point of failure.""The most valuable feature are the caching capabilities using the storage class memory.""The performance, reliability, and affordability has been most valuable."

More Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct Pros →

"The speed of the storage solution also allows us to provide service to applications that are ​very I/O ​intensive.""The two 10GE networks provide redundancy and increased performance as they serve as two separate networks doubling the throughput and doing multipathing and load balancing. We now have a high performance shared storage system which enables us to run on private cloud. Our previous system used bare-metal hardware, which provided high performance but inflexible management. Now we have best of both worlds, SSD-class performance with flexibility of a private cloud system.""Performance, redundancy, scalability and cost-effectiveness. StorPool delivers superbly in all of these areas.""Creating snapshots within seconds for big disks has helped our different migration projects since it allows us to perform them in a short period of time.""The team behind it was very engaged and had the skills and ability to support a service provider.""With StorPool we were able to build live failover on top of our LXC infrastructure. This allows us both to live-migrate containers between compute nodes without any downtime and, in case of an entire node suffering any type of failure, we can bring all containers back online within a minute on a spare compute node."

More StorPool Pros →

Cons
"Documentation management could be improved""It is difficult to get a hardware compatibility certification for the solution.""More optimization could be done in terms of mirroring.""I think the online documentation needs a lot of work and so do the sizing tools.""The management tool within this solution could be improved. We would also like to be able to access services like Azure when using this solution.""It is scalable, but only beyond two nodes. If I go for two nodes it's not scalable. I need to build a complete cluster from the beginning if I'm going for two nodes."

More Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct Cons →

"It would be good if, with next releases, StorPool provide a better GUI for monitoring and statistics. This would make our experience even better and complete.""Monitoring and statistics UI is a bit clumsy.""he only place we feel they could improve is the time it takes to bring new features to production.""Live and historical performance statistics would be useful, though my understanding is that this is on the way in a future release.""I have personally met with multiple Storpool engineers and spoke about different options and features. There are too many features that we don't know or use yet. My recommendation would be to promote the new features and give users different examples of how they can be used and how we can benefit from them.""At times we need to check the disks and do some minor operations. A friendlier user interface would be useful in such cases."

More StorPool Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "With the data center licensing and everything that is connected to that, this solution is relatively costly."
  • "Cost-wise the product is one of the more affordable within the category of products."
  • More Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It provides us with a significant reduction in TCO due to their pay-as-you-grow licensing model, which means we don’t have to pay upfront for hardware and licensing for capacity thStorPoolat we don’t yet need to use."
  • "StorPool's pricing and licensing model is very transparent. As always, one has to due his due diligence when choosing a product like distributed storage solutions."
  • "StorPool software is cost-effective and gives us a pricing advantage over our competitors."
  • More StorPool Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Defined Storage (SDS) solutions are best for your needs.
    770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:We found VMware’s vSAN was easy to set up, configure, and manage compared to other solutions we considered. It is best suited for small- to medium-sized organizations. It is easy to create load… more »
    Top Answer:It is difficult to get a hardware compatibility certification for the solution. In comparison, the process is easy for VMware and VSAN.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    2,046
    Comparisons
    1,393
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    241
    Rating
    7.0
    Views
    537
    Comparisons
    294
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    MS Storage Spaces Direct
    Learn More
    Overview

    Storage Spaces Direct uses industry-standard servers with local-attached drives to create highly available, highly scalable software-defined storage at a fraction of the cost of traditional SAN or NAS arrays. Its converged or hyper-converged architecture radically simplifies procurement and deployment, while features like caching, storage tiers, and erasure coding, together with the latest hardware innovation like RDMA networking and NVMe drives, deliver unrivaled efficiency and performance.

    StorPool is intelligent storage software that runs on standard servers and builds scalable, high-performance storage system out of these servers (software-defined storage). It focuses on the block-level storage and excels at it. It is incredibly flexible and can be deployed in both converged setups (on compute nodes, alongside VMs and applications) or on separate storage nodes.

    StorPool has advanced fully-distributed architecture and is arguably the fastest and most efficient block-storage software on the market today. It is the best storage system when building a cloud.

    Sample Customers
    Acuutech, Quest Technology Management, Bradley, Mead & Hunt
    CloudSigma, Kualo, Togglebox, Neterra, Serveo, Superhosting.bg, GroupOne, DRFortress, Metanet, Dia, Server Storage Solutions
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Government9%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Comms Service Provider21%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Government8%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business63%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise25%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise54%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business86%
    Large Enterprise14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise54%
    Buyer's Guide
    Software Defined Storage (SDS)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about StarWind, Nutanix, Red Hat and others in Software Defined Storage (SDS). Updated: April 2024.
    770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct is ranked 9th in Software Defined Storage (SDS) with 7 reviews while StorPool is ranked 20th in Software Defined Storage (SDS). Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct is rated 7.6, while StorPool is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct writes "Stable solution with an easy initial setup process". On the other hand, the top reviewer of StorPool writes "Enabled us to increase both our gross margins and performance while also decreasing latency". Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct is most compared with VMware vSAN, StarWind Virtual SAN, Red Hat Ceph Storage, Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) and DataCore SANsymphony, whereas StorPool is most compared with Red Hat Ceph Storage, VMware vSAN, LINBIT SDS, DataCore SANsymphony and StarWind Virtual SAN.

    See our list of best Software Defined Storage (SDS) vendors.

    We monitor all Software Defined Storage (SDS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.