SQL Server vs Teradata

SQL Server is ranked 3rd in Relational Databases with 28 reviews vs Teradata which is ranked 4th in Relational Databases with 19 reviews. The top reviewer of SQL Server writes "Just like a Windows PC needs basic defragmentation maintenance to run effectively, SQL Server needs its own regular maintenance". The top reviewer of Teradata writes "It is the core of our fundamental real-time reporting and operational planning. ". SQL Server is most compared with SAP IQ, Teradata and Oracle Database. Teradata is most compared with Oracle Exadata, SQL Server and Vertica. See our SQL Server vs Teradata report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
E6406859 e328 4990 a27b 2bf1abff976c avatar
reviewer125703
Sql server vs. teradata report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about SQL Server vs Teradata and others in Relational Databases.
270,485 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing SQL Server vs Teradata

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
Enables us to convert to bigger DBs and more easily move or upgrade between branches.Without any doubt the Integration Services and Analysis Services are the most widely used. These are the basis for data quality, data gathering, ETL process, as well as collation for the data warehouse, Cube-generation, and ad-hoc processes. The ease in which you may mold a process flow or even modularly add in new structures is something which is much needed in my job.It's a very capable, efficient, price-performant OLAP server.SSAS is the most interesting feature to organize the data and let the users play with it.If backups and alerts are configured properly, I can also rely on my restoration plan.It is quite reliable in cluster configurations and has helped me to reduce downtime and improve SLAs.Comparing with other database management systems that I tried in other companies, SQL Server is quite easy to install, configure, and maintain.You could have an offsite and an onsite, and if the onsite goes down, the offsite picks it up. I like that flexibility to provide continuing operations.

Read more »

It handles large amounts of information with a linear performance increase, in relation to a HW investment.It has a solid set of tools and consulting services.It has massive parallel processing ability to do large amounts of concurrent querying.It has given our business the ability to gain insights into the data and create data labs for analysis and PoCs.Cuts time to process huge amounts of data with efficient analytical queries.A conventional and easily defined way to build a data warehouse or a layer of data marts.Teradata can be easily used in ETL mode transformations, so there is no need for expensive and inconvenient ETL toolsAuto-partitioning and indexing, and resource allocation on the fly are key features.

Read more »

Cons
From a DB administrator perspective, I would like to see more space requirements and space capacity history, so that we are able to see which DBs are growing, and by how much per day or week.An area for improvement would be the SQL Server process monitoring, which is quite basic and could sustain more information.The only item which I can list is application failure during Integration Services debugging, when restarting a process flow. In a number of instances the solutions fails. I have not given this much thought and simply stop and start the debugging service rather than restarting.The web interface and the command line interface could be better so we could manage and build some things around an API. If we could build our own solution, our own interface, and then manage the solution through that open API, that would be better.For a big amount of data, when we are speaking about IoT Segments, and Big Data projects, there are performance issues.The reporting services of the solution (SSRS and now Power BI) are the less valuable items of the SQL Server suite.I would appreciate a dark theme for SQL Server Management Studio and ability to add databases with TDE enabled into availability groups.It pesters you to update the Client every month when there is nothing new that you really need to add, but it is constantly pestering you. I do not care for it.

Read more »

It needs a teaching web site with more training on third-party tools used for BI.We tried to use case Teradata for a data warehouse system, but we had some problems in relation to the Teradata system, CDC tools, and source databases. We were unable to transfer data from HPE Integrity mainframe to Teradata.There is a need to improve performance in high transaction processes, as well as the reporting system.Query language and its functionality are rather limited, compared to Oracle or even SQL Server. However, it is possible to perform any kind of logic in it (though some workarounds may be required).Data ingestion is done via external utilities and not by the query language itself. It would be more convenient to have that functionality within its SQL dialect.Needs compatibility with more Big Data platforms.It would help to make scaling easier with a reduced cost. ​​I think the UI is not there yet. It could be improved by being more user-friendly.​

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
My advice is quite straightforward. If you know the number of users who really and truly need access to the Server then it is a no-brainer. If you do not know, then get the basic package and minimum licenses and start from there. Needless to say, users can develop/use data structures outside and then deploy onto the Server.The price has been going higher and higher. The market is quite price sensitive.This is a downside of enterprise Microsoft products.Currently, almost all of my machines are in Azure and I think it is the best way of licensing now (VM+software).​We are a Microsoft shop, so we use Active Directory. That integrates well with this product, but we did look at Oracle. We also looked at IBM. This was the best price point for us for what we were getting.​​It has the easiest licensing.The free version is cumbersome to use and maintain. But $5000 for a licence is more expense than the benefit I would get from a licensed version. A licence might be worth the price to simplify management and speed up searches.

Read more »

We are looking for a more flexible cost model for the next version that we use, whether it be cloud or on-premise.Price is quite high, so if it is really possible to use other solutions (e.g. you do not have strict requirements for performance and huge data volumes), it might be better to look at alternatives from the RDBMS world.Teradata is expensive but gives value for money, especially if you don't want to move your data to the cloud.It is still a very expensive solution. While I very much like the pure technological supremacy of the software itself, I believe Teradata as a company needs to become more affordable. They are already losing the market to more flexible or cheaper competitors.Teradata is currently making improvements in this area.The initial cost may seem high, but the TCO is low.In the past, it turned out that other solutions, in order to provide the full range of abilities that the Teradata platform provides plus the migration costs, would end up costing more than Teradata does.Make sure you have the in-house skills to design and support the solution, as relying on external sources is extremely costly and tends to lock you into specific platforms, tools, and paradigms.

Read more »

Sql server vs. teradata report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about SQL Server vs Teradata and others in Relational Databases.
270,485 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
15,880
Comparisons
10,282
Reviews
28
Followers
1,022
Avg. Rating
8.6
Views
13,330
Comparisons
11,145
Reviews
19
Followers
1,317
Avg. Rating
8.5
Top Comparisons
Top Comparisons
Sap065658 logo 300x300 0r 01
Compared 18% of the time.
Teradata
Compared 17% of the time.
Jt hjyjg 400x400
Compared 12% of the time.
See more SQL Server competitors »
Jt hjyjg 400x400
Compared 30% of the time.
Microsoft 400x400
Compared 16% of the time.
Micro focus logo
Compared 13% of the time.
See more Teradata competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AsMicrosoft SQL Server, MSSQL, MS SQL
Website/Video
Website/VideoMicrosoft
  • Vendor 7622 screenshot 1524943927
Teradata
  • Vendor 8124 screenshot 1524949107
OverviewQuestionmark icon
Overview

SQL Server is the Microsoft-driven relational database management system. This system is used to store data as well as retrieve it when necessary; these functions can be supported by individual users or by multiple users within a larger network. The Microsoft SQL Server has warehousing options, quality and integration services, management tools that are simple to implement, as well as robust tools for development.

Looking at the more technical end of things, Microsoft SQL Server uses query languages such as T-SQL and ANSI SQL. Disaster recovery is one of the product's most prominent features, in addition to in-memory performance, scalability, and corporate business intelligence capabilities.

Teradata's portfolio of big data analytic solutions, integrated marketing applications, and services help organizations gain a sustainable competitive advantage with data.

OFFER
Learn more about SQL Server
Learn more about Teradata
Sample Customers
Sample CustomersMicrosoft SQL Server is used by businesses in every industry, including Great Western Bank, Aviva, the Volvo Car Corporation, BMW, Samsung, Principality Building Society, Wellmark Blue Cross and Blue Shield, and the Catholic District School Board of Eastern Ontario.Netflix
Top IndustriesQuestionmark icon
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Software R&D Company
14%
Transportation Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Retailer
10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Transportation Company
6%
Non Tech Company
6%
REVIEWERS
Comms Service Provider
43%
Financial Services Firm
29%
Transportation Company
14%
Energy/Utilities Company
14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm
24%
Comms Service Provider
16%
Software R&D Company
6%
Energy/Utilities Company
6%
Company SizeQuestionmark icon
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business
32%
Midsize Enterprise
34%
Large Enterprise
34%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
42%
Midsize Enterprise
20%
Large Enterprise
38%
REVIEWERS
Small Business
21%
Midsize Enterprise
11%
Large Enterprise
68%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
16%
Midsize Enterprise
14%
Large Enterprise
70%
Sql server vs. teradata report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about SQL Server vs Teradata and others in Relational Databases.
Download now
270,485 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email