Compare NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs. Veeam Backup for Microsoft Office 365

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is ranked 4th in Cloud Backup with 17 reviews while Veeam Backup for Microsoft Office 365 is ranked 8th in Cloud Backup with 10 reviews. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is rated 8.8, while Veeam Backup for Microsoft Office 365 is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP writes "Enables us to manage multiple petabytes of storage with a small team, including single node and HA instances". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Veeam Backup for Microsoft Office 365 writes "Easy to back up company emails to the cloud and offers an easy ability to restore to the cloud". NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is most compared with Red Hat Ceph Storage, VMware vSAN and IBM Spectrum Scale, whereas Veeam Backup for Microsoft Office 365 is most compared with Dell EMC CloudBoost, AvePoint Cloud Backup and NetApp Cloud Backup. See our NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs. Veeam Backup for Microsoft Office 365 report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs. Veeam Backup for Microsoft Office 365 and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
378,124 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
This solution has made everything easier to do.The solution’s unified file and block-storage access across our infrastructure is invaluable. Without it, we can't do what we do.The solution’s Snapshot copies and thin clones in terms of operational recovery are the best thing since sliced bread. Rollback is super easy. It's just simple, and it works. It's very efficient.The solution’s Snapshot copies and thin clones in terms of operational recovery are good. Snapshot copies are pretty much the write-in time data backups. Obviously, critical data is snapshotted a lot more frequently, and even clients and end users find it easier to restore whatever they need if it's file-based, statical, etc.We're using snapshots as well and it's a pretty useful feature. That is one of the main NetApp benefits. Knowing how to use snapshots in the on-prem environment, using snapshots on the cloud solution was natural for us.Unified Manager, System Manager, and Cloud Manager are all GUI-based. It's easy for somebody who has not been exposed to this for years to pick it up and work with it.We use the mirroring to mirror our volumes to our DR location. We also create snapshots for backups. Snapshots will create a specified snapshot to be able to do a DR test without disrupting our standard mirrors. That means we can create a point-in-time snapshot, then use the ability of FlexClones to make a writeable volume to test with, and then blow it away after the DR test.NetApp's Cloud Manager automation capabilities are very good because it's REST-API-driven, so we can completely automate everything. It has a good overview if you want to just have a look into your environment as well.

Read more »

The most valuable feature of this solution is the replication functionality.The setup is very simple. It takes 15 minutes.Backup and replication are the most valuable features.It is easy to use and easy to recover files.Veeam makes modular solutions, so you can install Veeam Backup for Office 365 and Veeam Backup and Replication in one single server. You can do an all in one installation, and roll it out.I have used the technical support a few times and they've been reasonably helpful.This is an easy-to-install easy-to-use solution for backing up Office 365 email.The solution is easy to use. It's very simple and clients find it very easy to find all objects and things they need with the Veeam Explorer.

Read more »

Cons
Multipathing for iSCSI LUNs is difficult to deal with from the client-side and I'd love to see a single entry point that can be moved around within the cluster to simplify the client configuration.We have used technical support. As long as they don't call me at four o'clock in the morning to tell me that a drive failed and they are sending me another one, I like it. They have a tendency to do that.How it handles erasure coding. I feel it the improvement should be there. Basically, it should be seamless. You don't want to have an underlying hardware issue or something, then suddenly there's no reads or writes. Luckily, it's at a replication site, so our main production site is still working and writing to it. But, the replication site has stopped right now while we try to bring that node back. Since we implemented in bare-metal, not in appliance, we had to go back to the original vendor. They didn't send it in time, and we had a hardware memory issue. Then, we had a hard disk issue, which brought the node down physically.The DR has room for improvement. For example, we now have NetApp in Western Europe and we would like to back up the information to another region. It's impossible. We need to bring up an additional NetApp in that other region and create a Cloud Manager automation to copy the data... I would prefer it to be a more integrated solution like it was in the NetApp solution about a year ago. I would like to see something like AltaVault but in the cloud.Some of the licensing is a little kludgey. We just created an HA environment in Azure and their licensing for SVMs per node is a little kludgey. They're working on it right now.Scale-up and scale-out could be improved. It would be interesting to have multiple HA pairs on one cluster, for example, or to increase the single instances more, from a performance perspective. It would be good to get more performance out of a single HA pair.One difficulty is that it has no SAP HANA certification. The asset performance restrictions create challenges with the infrastructure underneath: The disks and stuff like that often have lower latencies than SAP HANA itself has to have.The only issue we had lately was that outside our VPC we could not reach the virtual IP, the floating IP. I heard that they have fixed that...

Read more »

They need more documentation, awareness, and assistance.It needs to be able to integrate with other emailing systems, like Linux.In the next release, it should have direct export to tape drive abilities and NDMP support.Technical support could be improved.The capacity storage is a challenge everywhere in the backup industry. The general feedback people are coming back to about this is that there is no deduplication based on it.It would be a great improvement to be able to recover cover a VM straight to on-prem.While there really is nothing wrong with the product some small improvements in the interface could make it even easier to use.The solution announced many features two years ago, and they still have not happened, so I would hope that the next release has these ready to go.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Our licensing costs are folded into the hardware purchases and I have never differentiated between the two.Cost is a big factor, because a lot of companies can't afford enterprise grade equipment all the time. They skimp where they can. I would recommend that they improve the cost.Cloud is cloud. It's still expensive. Any good solution comes with a price tag. That's where we are looking to see how well we can manage our data in the cloud by trying to optimize the costs.I know the licensing is a bit on the high-end. That's when we had to downsize our MetroCluster disks and just migrate to disks that were half used. We migrated into those just to reduce maintenance costs.In addition to the standard licensing fees, there are fees for Azure, the VMs themselves and for data transfer.The standard pricing is online. Pricing depends. If you're using the PayGo model, then it's just the normal costs on the Microsoft page. If you're using Bring Your Own License, which is what we're doing, then you get with your sales contact at NetApp and start figuring out what price is the best, in the end, for your company.They allow a special price if you are working closely with them. Since we have a lot of NetApp systems, we got some kind of discount. That's something they do for other customers, not just for us. The price was fair. In addition to the licensing fees, you're paying Amazon for your usage...The AWS consumer-based pricing model makes it easy for developers to use their credit cards to spin up virtual servers immediately.

Read more »

The cost is a bit on the high side.I'm not sure about the price, but I think it could be lower.The pricing is middle-of-the-road compared with competing products.I think it's a fair price. It's around $36 per user, so I think it's a fair price for our customers.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Backup solutions are best for your needs.
378,124 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
4th
out of 44 in Cloud Backup
Views
3,638
Comparisons
2,245
Reviews
14
Average Words per Review
1,036
Avg. Rating
8.5
8th
out of 44 in Cloud Backup
Views
3,144
Comparisons
2,629
Reviews
6
Average Words per Review
557
Avg. Rating
8.0
Top Comparisons
Also Known As
ONTAP Cloud
Learn
NetApp
Veeam Software
Overview

The leading enterprise-grade storage management solution, delivers secure, proven storage management services and supports up to a capacity of 368TB. Software service supports various use cases, such as: File shares and block-level storage serving NAS (NFS, SMB / CIFS) and SAN (iSCSI) Disaster Recovery, Backup, and Archive DevOps Databases (SQL, Oracle, NoSQL) Cloud Volumes ONTAP is offered in a standard single-node configuration or in a High Availability (HA) configuration.

Veeam Backup for Microsoft Office 365 allows you to mitigate the risk of losing access to email data and helps to ensure data Availability to Office 365 users. This helps organizations comply with the policies, requirements and regulations due to long‑term archival, fully functional search and granular restore capabilities. Since it is integrated with Veeam Backup & Replication, the solution can be used to back up hybrid cloud environments and migrate mailbox data between Exchange Online and on‑premises Exchange organizations.

https://www.veeam.com/backup-microsoft-office-365.html

Offer
Learn more about NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP
Learn more about Veeam Backup for Microsoft Office 365
Sample Customers
Rohit, AdvacnedMD, D2L, Trinity Mirror, Eidos Media, WireStorm, Cordant Group, JFK Medical Center, ALD Automotive, Healthix, City of Baton Rouge, ON Semiconductor Columbia Power & Water Systems
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Healthcare Company26%
Energy/Utilities Company13%
Pharma/Biotech Company9%
Manufacturing Company9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company36%
Manufacturing Company23%
Comms Service Provider8%
Financial Services Firm5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company44%
Construction Company8%
Manufacturing Company6%
Financial Services Firm6%
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs. Veeam Backup for Microsoft Office 365 and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
378,124 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Cloud Backup reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email