Compare NGINX Web Application Firewall vs. Radware AppWall

NGINX Web Application Firewall is ranked 16th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 3 reviews while Radware AppWall is ranked 18th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 2 reviews. NGINX Web Application Firewall is rated 8.0, while Radware AppWall is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of NGINX Web Application Firewall writes "A stable system with good security and load balancing". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Radware AppWall writes "Easy to use, easy to configure, and the hardware is robust". NGINX Web Application Firewall is most compared with Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, AWS WAF and Fortinet FortiWeb, whereas Radware AppWall is most compared with F5 BIG-IP, Imperva Incapsula and Fortinet FortiWeb.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Radware AppWall? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about F5, Cloudflare, Reblaze and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: March 2020.
408,154 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The most valuable feature is that there is a link in the system that will help to analyze the security of an application when something abnormal is found.The most valuable feature is that I can establish different services from the firewall.It is a very good tool for load balancing.

Read more »

Security is one of the most valuable features that I like. It is easy to use and easy to configure.The features that mitigate attacks are very valuable.

Read more »

Cons
Setting policies and parameters through the UI should be more automated because the process is manual, where we can only edit one rule at a time.The configuration needs to be more flexible because it is difficult to do things that are outside of the ordinary.

Read more »

Support is very important because if we get good support, we'll be able to sell and supply more numbers.The GUI needs to be improved. Right now, the solution isn't so user-friendly.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
The licensing fees for this solution are pretty expensive for what it does, but there is no alternative.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
408,154 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
1,209
Comparisons
960
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
467
Avg. Rating
8.0
Views
994
Comparisons
836
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
264
Avg. Rating
8.5
Top Comparisons
Compared 23% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Also Known As
NGINX WAF
Learn
F5
Video Not Available
Radware
Overview

Even when you understand security, it is difficult to create secure applications, especially when working under the pressures so common in today’s enterprise. The NGINX Web Application Firewall (WAF) protects applications against sophisticated Layer 7 attacks that might otherwise lead to systems being taken over by attackers, loss of sensitive data, and downtime. The NGINX WAF is based on the widely used ModSecurity open source software.

AppWall - Radware's Web Application Firewall (WAF), ensures fast, reliable and secure delivery of mission-critical Web applications for corporate networks and in the cloud. AppWall is an ICSA Labs certified and PCI compliant WAF that combines positive and negative security models to provide complete protection against web application attacks, web application attacks behind CDNs, API manipulations, advanced HTTP attacks (slowloris, dynamic floods), brute force attacks on login pages and more.
Offer
Learn more about NGINX Web Application Firewall
Learn more about Radware AppWall
Sample Customers
m.a.x ITAccuview.com, Ace, ADP, BuyPass, Computershare, DTCC, Firehost, Garanti, HP, Konami, Mohawk, SeatPG, Telenet
Find out what your peers are saying about F5, Cloudflare, Reblaze and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: March 2020.
408,154 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.