Compare HAProxy vs. Radware Alteon

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
HAProxy Logo
15,807 views|11,387 comparisons
Radware Alteon Logo
3,693 views|3,027 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use Radware Alteon? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about HAProxy vs. Radware Alteon and other solutions. Updated: November 2020.
448,076 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"It solves a problem for me where I can build files, not based on the health of the check, but rather the speed of the check.""The feature that I have found the most valuable is that it works for my use case of application load balancing. I'm using it for PeerSense, and it's easy enough for PeerSense."

More HAProxy Pros »

"The most valuable aspect is that it establishes user security.""It is easy to expand. Our clients are enterprise-size.""The most valuable feature is the load-balancing reverse proxy.""The interface is easy, it's friendly, and has good alerting."

More Radware Alteon Pros »

Cons
"The logging functionality could use improvement, as it is a little cryptic.""Pricing, monitoring, and reports can be improved."

More HAProxy Cons »

"I would like for the load balancing to work with premier and the cloud, a mix of premium and cloud.""Load balancing needs improvement. It needs better integration. I heard f5 works as a DNS operator which is not available in this solution. It would be better if that was implemented.""We are having a difficult time with the security module, and how to implement the Radware security.""Support is an area that needs improvement."

More Radware Alteon Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The only cost is for the image manager, who is responsible for uploading the image, and that is trivial.""HAProxy is free in the initial offer. However, pricing can be improved."

More HAProxy Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Delivery Controllers solutions are best for your needs.
448,076 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: It is easy to expand. Our clients are enterprise-size.
Top Answer: Load balancing needs improvement. It needs better integration. I heard f5 works as a DNS operator which is not available in this solution. It would be better if that was implemented.
Top Answer: We use it for inbound traffic. We have web access portals.
Ranking
Views
15,807
Comparisons
11,387
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
248
Avg. Rating
8.7
Views
3,693
Comparisons
3,027
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
296
Avg. Rating
8.5
Popular Comparisons
Compared 31% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 47% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Also Known As
HAProxy Community Edition, HAProxy Enterprise Edition, HAPEEAlteon
Learn
HAProxy
Video Not Available
Radware
Overview

HAProxy is the most widely used software load balancer and application delivery controller in the world. The core HAProxy application delivery engine is an open source project chiefly maintained by HAProxy Technologies and assisted by a thriving open source community. HAProxy Community Edition is available for free at haproxy.org. HAProxy Enterprise Edition is packaged with additional enterprise class features, services and premium support from HAProxy Technologies.

Radware Alteon application delivery controller (ADC) and the load balancer that with application SLA. It provides advanced, end-to-end local and global load balancing capabilities for all Web, cloud and mobile-based applications. Alteon load balancer combines best-of-breed application delivery capabilities, market-leading SSL performance that supports all of the latest encryption protocols, and advanced services to companies with ongoing application lifecycle management challenges that impact the performance of web applications (such as heavier, more complex web content); mobility, and the migration to the cloud.
Offer
Learn more about HAProxy
Learn more about Radware Alteon
Sample Customers
Booking.com, GitHub, Reddit, StackOverflow, Tumblr, Vimeo, YelpConvergys
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm30%
Marketing Services Firm20%
Retailer20%
Non Profit10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company34%
Comms Service Provider21%
Media Company8%
K 12 Educational Company Or School5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company33%
Comms Service Provider30%
Financial Services Firm6%
Retailer4%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business23%
Midsize Enterprise55%
Large Enterprise23%
REVIEWERS
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise29%
Large Enterprise57%
Find out what your peers are saying about HAProxy vs. Radware Alteon and other solutions. Updated: November 2020.
448,076 professionals have used our research since 2012.

HAProxy is ranked 6th in Application Delivery Controllers with 3 reviews while Radware Alteon is ranked 9th in Application Delivery Controllers with 4 reviews. HAProxy is rated 8.6, while Radware Alteon is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of HAProxy writes "A containerized solution for TCP load balancing". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Radware Alteon writes "A good load-balancing reverse proxy for internal applications that is easy to setup and has good technical support". HAProxy is most compared with F5 BIG-IP, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, NGINX Plus, Citrix ADC and Barracuda Load Balancer ADC, whereas Radware Alteon is most compared with F5 BIG-IP, Citrix ADC, A10 Networks Thunder ADC, Radware LinkProof and NGINX Plus. See our HAProxy vs. Radware Alteon report.

See our list of best Application Delivery Controllers vendors.

We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.