We performed a comparison between Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management and Sift Digital Trust and Safety based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention."The most valuable feature is the designer, which allows us to connect to UI and build things directly, such as creating a platform with our synchronizing policy manager rules, without any additional requirements."
"The solution's technical support is good."
"The solution loads big data efficiently and quickly."
"The case management tool is user friendly."
"The solution is easier to set up, configure, and use than other products."
"The tool helped my clients track some fraudulent activities which couldn’t have been possible without the solution. Once the solution is deployed, the system of the client needs to be upgraded and overhauled to reflect the new system. The end users can see the benefits of it. The integration of the solution is increasing the customer base of our clients since more customers from other banks have decided to join the client bank due to the level of security."
"The most valuable feature is automation which makes our transaction capture 40 percent easier."
"The process and technology in the solution are very fast, and it is bug-free."
"It's nice to be able to have access to a 90-day POC process."
"Could include additional customization"
"It has become too complex for its own good with a lot of versions. They are trying to do too much. Instead of keeping it sort of traditional and keeping the core search engine as a standalone and having analytical bolt-ons, they have decided to jam it all into the same product, which made the product overly complex and difficult to implement."
"It would be better if it integrated with other tools. Actimize uses many databases, and everything on Actimize has been deployed to the database. On the customer side, on the front end side, if they focus more on integrating with other applications, it can make the tool better. The reporting feature and dashboards could be better. In the next release, I would like them to incorporate a Tableau-type reporting structure within this tool."
"The patch section has room for improvement."
"I would like for it to proactively give suggestions or hints before initiating the transaction. It could make use of the data that has already occurred, like machine learning. It should learn patterns from specific countries."
"The solution needs to mitigate and provide an update for one listener process that keeps failing."
"It is complex in terms of daily maintenance. Other detection platforms run on a 15-day or one-month window, whereas this particular platform runs daily. Therefore, it requires daily maintenance. If there is a delay due to this daily maintenance, it creates a snowball effect impacting the subsequent days. It takes a lot of effort to catch up and get into BAU mode. It would be great if they could include certain features to make the daily processing less complex, but I don't see that happening. It is a complex product, and with each version release, it is just becoming more and more complex."
"Sometimes when we move from one version to another, a few things don't work as expected."
"The user interface can be improved upon."
More Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is ranked 1st in Fraud Detection and Prevention with 17 reviews while Sift Digital Trust and Safety is ranked 25th in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is rated 8.2, while Sift Digital Trust and Safety is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management writes "Highly intelligent and effective for detecting fraud in transactions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sift Digital Trust and Safety writes "Has a good 90-day POC but needs better machine learning and an updated user interface". Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is most compared with BAE Systems NetReveal, FICO Falcon Platform, IBM Safer Payments, ThreatMetrix and Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub, whereas Sift Digital Trust and Safety is most compared with Forter, DataVisor and Accertify Interceptas.
See our list of best Fraud Detection and Prevention vendors.
We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
