Nintex Process Platform vs SoftExpert BPM comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Nintex Logo
5,293 views|2,669 comparisons
90% willing to recommend
SoftExpert Logo
152 views|91 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Nintex Process Platform and SoftExpert BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Nintex Process Platform vs. SoftExpert BPM Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"I find it useful to utilize LDAP query action to find out the status of a particular user.""NWC forms could be better. Also, the ability to build workflows that are not dependent on SharePoint is very desirable. The forms feature just isn’t as functional as the forms for SharePoint.""I really like the visual representation. It actually looks like a flow chart, which is nicer than a SharePoint Designer workflow, which doesn't have that ability.""Allows us to provide desktop/laptop and mobile solutions to our users.""It saves time as tasks are automated.""Our solutions using Nintex has been most successful in automating HR processes because it allows you to easily and rapidly build solutions that conform to the unique business processes for each entity.""Easily maintained and customization is quite simple.""The integration capabilities have been very useful."

More Nintex Process Platform Pros →

"A complete project management suite in one integrated package.""The most valuable feature of SoftExpert BPM is its ease of use."

More SoftExpert BPM Pros →

Cons
"I would also like to see the BPM features from Pega implemented, that have to do with the implementation of AI, and the robotics.""Nintex seems to be very server intensive. It is one of the reasons that we are moving to a different product on the SharePoint 2016 platform.""The security features for this solution need to be improved.""We would like to design parallel workflows and long-running workflows, along with new features for connecting to cloud-based systems.""​Bring all features available from the on-premise product into the cloud version and the workflow error reporting.​""The licensing needs to be improved. Right now, we find it's getting more expensive to use the product.""The solution needs more RPA and AI features.""We'd like to have integration with SharePoint."

More Nintex Process Platform Cons →

"It could do more to use all the data it collects to intelligently manage the user experience.""The form in SoftExpert BPM should improve."

More SoftExpert BPM Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Nintex products are expensive, but valuable. Licensing in on-premise was historically based on a perpetual model, where you’d license per Web front-end. However, they are switching exclusively to a consumption (subscription) model, where you purchase the number of workflows you think you’ll use in your environment, and can scale up from there."
  • "Offering a licensing model that allows for multiple small workflows would be a huge improvement to an already great platform."
  • "Our maintenance costs are reduced."
  • "The annual support costs are expensive."
  • "Comparatively, it's expensive."
  • "We pay on a yearly basis. It's my understanding that we pay approximately $11,000/year."
  • "The initial investment in K2 is heavy. Currently, the expenditure is $28,000 for a year. After we go to the cloud, it is going to be per seat and probably cheaper. Currently, there are unlimited users."
  • "There is an initial fee when purchasing and a fee for maintenance afterward."
  • More Nintex Process Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The price of SoftExpert BPM is not expensive."
  • More SoftExpert BPM Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The latest version of Nintex has many features. We have a clear roadmap and the necessary application to integrate it into our platform.
    Top Answer:The solution doesn’t have an extra fee. We are compatible with the package.
    Top Answer:The solution does not integrate with many platforms.
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of SoftExpert BPM is its ease of use.
    Top Answer:The price of SoftExpert BPM is not expensive.
    Top Answer:The form in SoftExpert BPM should improve.
    Ranking
    Views
    5,293
    Comparisons
    2,669
    Reviews
    17
    Average Words per Review
    484
    Rating
    8.1
    Views
    152
    Comparisons
    91
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    180
    Rating
    10.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    K2 blackpearl, K2 Five, Nintex Workflow
    Learn More
    Overview

    Discover, automate, and optimize your business processes with the Nintex Process Platform. This powerful and user-friendly platform offers comprehensive process automation and intelligence. Easily discover, map, and manage your processes, automate workflows, eliminate paper forms, and accelerate tasks with RPA bots. Collaborate with your team using Nintex Automation Cloud Services and optimize your processes through data-driven insights. Monitor and analyze your processes to identify and address issues, and make updates based on data for continuous improvement. Achieve process excellence with the Nintex Process Platform.

    SoftExpert is a market leader in software and services for enterprise-wide business process improvement and compliance management, providing the most comprehensive application suite to empower organizations to increase business performance at all levels and to maximize industry-mandated compliance and corporate governance programs.

    Sample Customers
    SEA Corp, Omnicom Group, Verizon, STIHL
    Coca Cola, CRODA, CSN, Abril, Midea Carrier
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Manufacturing Company15%
    Energy/Utilities Company15%
    Insurance Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Insurance Company6%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business36%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise50%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise63%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Nintex Process Platform vs. SoftExpert BPM
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Nintex Process Platform vs. SoftExpert BPM and other solutions. Updated: April 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Nintex Process Platform is ranked 9th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 21 reviews while SoftExpert BPM is ranked 23rd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews. Nintex Process Platform is rated 8.0, while SoftExpert BPM is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Nintex Process Platform writes "Offers good integration capabilities and easy to learn and good stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SoftExpert BPM writes "Quick deployment, high availability, and easy to use". Nintex Process Platform is most compared with Camunda, IBM BPM, Appian, Pega BPM and SAP Signavio Process Manager, whereas SoftExpert BPM is most compared with . See our Nintex Process Platform vs. SoftExpert BPM report.

    See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

    We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.