We performed a comparison between Nintex Process Platform and SAP Signavio Process Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."K2's best feature is that it can solve complex tasks, issues, and projects with little coding."
"It is very easy to create and deploy. I am very happy with how user-friendly Nintex Workflow is."
"The SharePoint feature is a really good connection, there are many features that are good."
"I think the initial setup is fine."
"I think that it adds value to any organization, mainly in terms of business applications where you need workflows."
"It is a scalable product."
"It saves time as tasks are automated."
"It has integration with BI and Analytics tools, and RPA toolsets as well."
"It's easy and fast. It's very quick to work with process teams in terms of improving processes. You just have to send them a URL and to have a process in front of them. I don't use all of the possibilities we have in Signavio. This has made it easier for people to adopt, because when we scrambled the process team together and started a process of improvement, it improved their process. They are much more involved than they had been earlier, and they can also use Signavio to make smaller improvements in the process for themselves. There are many more interactions between the process teams and Signavio than in our previous solution, where you had to hire in a professional process modeler. It's been a great improvement."
"The most valuable feature is the glossary. It is really nice because all of the information is centralized, and that is a big help to the company."
"The interface is very intuitive and includes a drag-and-drop function."
"The GUI is very easy to use, where you can sit together with your colleagues, discuss the process, and during these discussions you can build up the model."
"I use SAP Signavio Process Manager to model processes to the former operating model."
"The ability to leave comments in the Collaboration Hub is a good and easy way for the employees to give feedback on the processes."
"It is a very scalable solution."
"The formatting features are quite good because you can create very complex models, but you can easily clean them up so that they look very nice."
"The solution is a bit too expensive. It could be cheaper."
"The licensing needs to be improved. Right now, we find it's getting more expensive to use the product."
"Nintex is still at the starting point of integrating with AI. It has integrated with a very small piece of artificial intelligence., like only integrated with the Google Cloud. There is a benefit, like a no-code and low-code solution. But, again, if you are a developer, especially if you are a hardcore developer, you are using your code knowledge, its skills, and all. And, suddenly, you are moving into the low-code solution, and then you will feel, like, so many things you can't achieve with the low-code solution."
"Unfortunately, Nintex Workflow is not that stable. We are looking at shifting to another tool."
"The tool lacks to offer support for the Arabic language, and it needs consideration."
"Built-in reporting on-prem is limited and clunky at best."
"Currently, copying workflow actions from one workflow to another is not possible. Also, the Office 365 solution is not as mature as on-premise."
"Nintex seems to be very server intensive. It is one of the reasons that we are moving to a different product on the SharePoint 2016 platform."
"I would like to see more predictive analytics. The tool already has all the process maps, but it could offer a more proactive improvement offering. For example, they could put a little bit more machine learning behind it."
"The solution’s pricing could be improved."
"I think the interface itself can improve a bit. I think the interface is still stuck about a decade in the past, if I may be so brutal about it. Some of the buttons are really small, so you can't even see them. I think it needs upgrading to the 21st century with apps and the way we use mobile phones."
"Part of the product that I think can improve is document control. That's currently not even possible. To work with documents we have something of a workaround using SharePoint."
"It would be beneficial to have a defined leveling or hierarchy system to facilitate better understanding and analysis. More openness and flexibility would enhance its capabilities."
"There is always room for improvement is the capability of integration with other solutions."
"I would like to see more integration with the process manager in terms of the workflow accelerator."
"It is sometimes difficult to find the match between what is possible and what is wanted, or what is helpful with the product, so better documentation may assist in this regard."
Nintex Process Platform is ranked 9th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 21 reviews while SAP Signavio Process Manager is ranked 8th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 57 reviews. Nintex Process Platform is rated 8.0, while SAP Signavio Process Manager is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Nintex Process Platform writes "Offers good integration capabilities and easy to learn and good stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Signavio Process Manager writes "Has many functionalities and is used to model processes to the former operating model". Nintex Process Platform is most compared with Camunda, IBM BPM, Appian, Pega BPM and Bizagi, whereas SAP Signavio Process Manager is most compared with Celonis, ARIS BPA, Camunda, Visio and ADONIS. See our Nintex Process Platform vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.